2022
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of apoptotic versus nonapoptotic cell death using label‐free computational microscopy

Abstract: Identification of cell death mechanisms, par-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We trained a MaskRCNN model ( He et al 2017 ) to detect ApoBDs in these processed images, as the model has demonstrated exceptional results in instance segmentation for medical images ( Anantharaman et al 2018 , Johnson 2020 , Jin et al 2021 , Padma et al 2022 ). The model has the ResNet50 architecture for feature extraction backbone, and the weights are pre-trained on ImageNet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We trained a MaskRCNN model ( He et al 2017 ) to detect ApoBDs in these processed images, as the model has demonstrated exceptional results in instance segmentation for medical images ( Anantharaman et al 2018 , Johnson 2020 , Jin et al 2021 , Padma et al 2022 ). The model has the ResNet50 architecture for feature extraction backbone, and the weights are pre-trained on ImageNet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doxorubicin [81,[83][84][85] and Raptinal [86] induce apoptosis [87] which results in the reduction of cell volume and membrane blebbing, among others, which can be clearly observed in figures 2(d)-(f). The concentrations of these drugs for BT-20 cells were previously optimized and their efficacy were monitored using holographic microscopy and western blot [53]. Whereas, hydrogen peroxide at high concentration induces necrosis [88,89] which is characterized by cell swelling and loss of membrane integrity which results in the leakage of cytosolic content.…”
Section: Detection Of Cell Death Process Using Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence-based microscopy techniques require labeling the cells with different fluorophores such as Calcein, Propidium Iodide, fluorescently labeled Annexin V [41][42][43] and others. Label-free techniques such as quantitative phase imaging (QPI), phase contrast microscopy [44][45][46][47], Raman microspectroscopy [48][49][50][51][52], and digital holography [53,54] have also been explored as alternative modalities to visualize (and quantify) some of the morphological hallmarks of cell death, such as cell shape factor, volume, blebbing, shrinkage, and membrane rupture, amongst others. In Phase contrast microscopy [55], the change in phase of light passing through and interacting with sample is visualized as a change in brightness in the image and is not quantitative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent progress in computer vision has opened the possibility of automating the detection of objects and patterns in biological images and image series ( Hallou et al, 2021 ). In particular, deep-learning approaches have been used successfully to recognise cellular events, such as cell division and cell death in yeast ( Aspert et al, 2022 ) or in mammalian cell culture ( Kabir et al, 2022 ; La Greca et al, 2021 ; Mahecic et al, 2022 ; Phan et al, 2019 ; Shkolyar et al, 2015 ). However, this was mostly applied to transmission light microscopy and these pipelines are not applicable to large samples and embryos, where imaging mostly relies on fluorescent and confocal microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%