2018
DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2018.19.11.3093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis

Abstract: This paper addresses the automated detection of microcalcification clusters from mammogram images by enhanced preprocessing operations on digital mammograms for automated extraction of breast tissue from background, removing artefacts occurring during image registration using X-rays, followed by fractal analysis of suspicious regions. Identification of breast of either left or right and realigning them to a standard position forms a primitive step in preprocessing of mammograms. As the next step in the process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histopathology and mammography phenotypes were analyzed by Hamidinekoo et al [12] with the purpose of determining their biological characteristics. The pre-processing approach for mammograms was upgraded by Gowri et al [13] to facilitate the robotic extraction of tissue.…”
Section: Literature Review and Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histopathology and mammography phenotypes were analyzed by Hamidinekoo et al [12] with the purpose of determining their biological characteristics. The pre-processing approach for mammograms was upgraded by Gowri et al [13] to facilitate the robotic extraction of tissue.…”
Section: Literature Review and Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahmood et al [16] employed machine learning integrated with the radiomic approach to classifying the textural and statistical features, attaining 98% accuracy and 0.90 AUC. Apart from that, Gowri et al [17] also used textural features with fractal analysis and obtained 96.3% accuracy. Melekoodappattu et al [5] proposed a hybrid extreme machine learning classifier consisting of the extreme learning machine (ELM) with the fruitfly optimization algorithm (ELM-FOA) along with glowworm swarm optimization (GSO).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such features included intensity, statistical, shape, and textural features [5]. The grey-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), which calculates the occurrence of various grey levels in a region of interest (ROI), is a well-known texture feature and is utilised extensively in the literature [5,[15][16][17]. Nevertheless, all of these features focus on local information of the images and are often burdened with details, resulting in data complexity [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical features like surrounding region dependence (SRD), spatial grey-level dependence (SGLD), grey-level run length (GLRL), grey-level difference (GLD) have been used for extracting contrast, entropy, angular second moment (energy), correlation, difference variance, inverse difference moment, skewness, kurtosis, and intensity ratio for the classification of abnormalities [31,32,30,33]. Similarly, multiscale texture features have been extracted using variants of wavelets with various scaling functions [21,34,35,36] and fractal methods [37,38]. Recently, deep learning techniques have been developed for detection and for classifying the lesions in mammograms [39,40,41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%