2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated design of distributed control rules for the self-assembly of prespecified artificial structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, alternate algorithms can be used to build structures for which no valid structpath exists; probabilistic rules for movement and attachment could lead to structures not fully predetermined; or robots could build temporary staircases as scaffolds, removing them after a primary desired structure is complete [3,13], thus allowing them to build taller structures with otherwise unclimbable walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, alternate algorithms can be used to build structures for which no valid structpath exists; probabilistic rules for movement and attachment could lead to structures not fully predetermined; or robots could build temporary staircases as scaffolds, removing them after a primary desired structure is complete [3,13], thus allowing them to build taller structures with otherwise unclimbable walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable examples include robots capable of manipulating and/or maneuvering over specialized blocks [6,10], two-dimensional systems where robots assemble structures from blocks [12] or struts [2], cooperative assembly by sophisticated robots [8,9], and a strut-climbing robot that has been proposed as a component of a system where such robots form a structure together with passive struts [1]. Theoretical work on collective construction has also produced several algorithmic approaches to automating building with blocks or struts, in two and three dimensions [3,4,5,10,11,12,14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D 'houses' built from intelligent autonomous robot bricks) each robot has a stigmergic rule set describing the whole structure and decides what to be (i.e. wall, corner) according to where it finds itself after randomly attaching [18]. While this methodology is provably correct it has the drawback of requiring a high level of random motion (i.e.…”
Section: Developmental Level: So Through Real Robot Autonomous Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [5] proposed a distributed gene regulatory network (GRN) based algorithm for multi-robot construction, in which the global shape information is embedded into the GRN dynamics directly and the local interaction among the robots is represented by the diffusion terms; they showed, in simulation, that different pre-defined simple shapes can be formed. Also tested in simulation, Grushin and Reggia [4] developed an automated rule generation procedure that allows structures to successfully self-assemble in an environment with constrained, continuous motion. Apart from controlling the morphologies of lattice type or chain type robots, Christensen et al have proposed a simple language, SWARMMORPH-script, for arbitrary morphology generation for selfassembling robots [1], where each robot is fully autonomous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%