2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.3649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Design of Aerogravity-Assist Trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Patching the multiple gravity-assist trajectory It patches gravity-assist trajectories together by the method of C 3 matching [7,8], where C 3 defines the hyperbolic excess velocity squared 2 ∞ V . The C 3 matching problem involves matching the magnitude of an incoming V to effect encounter with target body in the trajectory path.…”
Section: Evaluating the Accessibility Of Asteroid By Using Multiple Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Patching the multiple gravity-assist trajectory It patches gravity-assist trajectories together by the method of C 3 matching [7,8], where C 3 defines the hyperbolic excess velocity squared 2 ∞ V . The C 3 matching problem involves matching the magnitude of an incoming V to effect encounter with target body in the trajectory path.…”
Section: Evaluating the Accessibility Of Asteroid By Using Multiple Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have been performed on various mission scenarios that operate within or through a planet's atmosphere [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . Five such trajectories in or through the Martian atmosphere have been examined in this work.…”
Section: Martian Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is related to the situations considered in the present research, because the atmosphere passage acts like an impulsive maneuver in some aspects. References on this topic are Lewis and McRonald (1992), Lohar et al (1994), Sims et al (1995), Lohar et al (1996), Bonfiglio et al (2000), Sims et al (2000), Trask and Coverstone (2004), Lavagna et al (2005) and Armellin et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%