2013 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/reconfig.2013.6732272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated design flow for no-cost configuration error detection in sram-based FPGAs

Abstract: Soft errors in the configuration memory of SRAMbased FPGAs cause significant and remanent application disturbances. However, classical mitigation techniques based on massive redundancy are too costly for most applications. The method presented in this paper is based on selective redundancy in partially used LUTs. It can be applied so that no hardware is added at the system level and it has been automated in standard design flows for Xilinx and Altera families. The detection of soft errors in the configuration … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) LUT Content Faults: Most methods are based on the dual-output LUTs and use the unused parts of the LUTs to mask some faults in the LUTs by duplication [10], [11], [12] or use TMR method [13]. The method presented in [14] maximizes the fault-masking capabilities of a LUT using logic decomposition and restructuring.…”
Section: ) Routing Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) LUT Content Faults: Most methods are based on the dual-output LUTs and use the unused parts of the LUTs to mask some faults in the LUTs by duplication [10], [11], [12] or use TMR method [13]. The method presented in [14] maximizes the fault-masking capabilities of a LUT using logic decomposition and restructuring.…”
Section: ) Routing Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presented in [12] uses similar technique to the one presented in this paper, but it is based on duplication, thus it requires comparators to operate and it is not focused to achieve 100% fault coverage. Our proposed parity waterfall method combines several practices, it is able to cover all possible faults and uses the basic element of existing modern FPGAs.…”
Section: ) Routing Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%