Automated decentralized modal analysis using smart sensors

Abstract

Understanding the dynamic behavior of civil engineering structures is important to adequately resolve problems related to structural vibration. The dynamic properties of a structure are commonly obtained by conducting a modal survey that can be used for model updating, design verification, and improvement of serviceability. However, particularly for large‐scale civil structures, modal surveys using traditional wired sensor systems can be quite challenging to carry out due to difficulties in cabling, high equipment cost, and long setup time. Wireless smart sensor networks (WSSN) offer a unique opportunity to overcome such difficulties. Recent advances in sensor technology have realized low‐cost smart sensors with on‐board computation and wireless communication capabilities, making deployment of a dense array of sensors on large civil structures both feasible and economical. However, as opposed to wired sensor networks in which centralized data acquisition and processing are a common practice, the WSSN requires decentralized algorithms due to the limitation associated with wireless communication; to date such algorithms are limited. This paper proposes a new decentralized hierarchical approach for modal analysis that reliably determines the global modal properties and can be implemented on a network of smart sensors. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated through several numerical examples. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Wireless Measurement System for Structural Health Monitoring With High Time-Synchronization Accuracy

“…Although time-synchronization protocols have been intensely studied, requirements on synchronization from an application perspective have not been clearly addressed. The effect of time-synchronization error on SHM applications is studied in [10]. The most restricted requirement is 120 ¡J>S according to the study in [8].…”

“…After that, other systems such as RBS [10], where each sensor sends reference beacons to their neighbors, FTSP [12], or TPSN [13] appear to reduce the synchronization error to < 20 ¡J,S, but their accumulative error can reach 5 ms in a period of6s [7].…”

Structural Identification of an 18-Story RC Building in Nepal Using Post-Earthquake Ambient Vibration and Lidar Data

“…This method has been previously applied successfully for OMA of civil structures (Caicedo et al, 2004;He et al, 2006;Siringoringo and Fujino, 2008;Brownjohn et al, 2010;Sim et al, 2010;Moaveni et al, 2014). The obtained raw data are first processed to mitigate signal noise and remove voltage spikes.…”

Smart One-Channel Sensor Node for Ambient Vibration Test with Applications to Structural Health Monitoring of Large Civil Infrastructures

“…Nagayama and Spencer developed a reliable wireless communication protocol that ensures all packets transmitted without loss by resending lost packets [12]. An alternative approach is to employ wireless sensor's onboard computing capability that performs in-network data processing to extract essential information such as structural damage locations from raw sensor data and subsequently be collected at the central base station [14][15][16]. As the size of extracted information is smaller than the raw data, this approach can significantly reduce the wireless communication, resulting in increased reliability as well as reduced battery consumption.…”