2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated control of inspired oxygen for preterm infants: What we have and what we need

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review, Fathabadi et al detailed the mean characteristics of algorithms developed for automation of inspired oxygen control in preterm infants and classified them in four categories: rule‐based (fuzzy or non‐fuzzy algorithms), proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID), adaptive, and robust (this algorithm is not available in the clinical practice) …”
Section: Systems For Automated Control Of Fio2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review, Fathabadi et al detailed the mean characteristics of algorithms developed for automation of inspired oxygen control in preterm infants and classified them in four categories: rule‐based (fuzzy or non‐fuzzy algorithms), proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID), adaptive, and robust (this algorithm is not available in the clinical practice) …”
Section: Systems For Automated Control Of Fio2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, FiO 2 can be titrated automatically 18 19. Randomised trials comparing automated FiO 2 systems with manual titration for short periods demonstrated an increase in the proportion of time spent with SpO 2 within target range varying between 8% and 24% 20–23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices for automated control of oxygen therapy have at their heart an algorithm which compares incoming SpO 2 readings with a desired setpoint (normally the midpoint of the target range), and calculates an updated value for FiO 2 , which is actuated mechanically 5 6. Recently reported algorithms differ considerably one from another, both in their responsiveness and the nature of the algorithm for adjusting FiO 2 7–9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%