Anais Do Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe 2020) 2020
DOI: 10.5753/kdmile.2020.11975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated classification of cardiology diagnoses based on textual medical reports

Abstract: Automatic diagnoses of diseases has been a long term challenge for Computer Science and related disciplines. Textual clinical reports can be used as a great source of data for such diagnoses. However, building classification models from them is not a trivial task. The problem tackled in this work is the identification of the medical diagnoses that are indicated in these reports. In the past, several methods have been proposed for addressing this problem, but a method developed for reports in the cardiology are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final report with the ECG abnormalities was obtained by imputing the classifier results for recognition of each ECG abnormality. The classification model was tested on 4557 medical reports manually labeled by two cardiologists with 80.7% positive predictive value, 94.3% sensitivity and 87.0% F1 score for AF; 86.1% positive predictive value, 95.4% sensitivity and 90.9% F1 score for RBBB; 91.4% positive predictive value, 86.0% sensitivity and 88.6% F1 score for LBBB; 75.6% positive predictive value, 93.5% sensitivity and 83.6% F1 score for AVB, and 96.7% positive predictive value, 96.7% sensitivity and 96.7% F1 score for ventricular pre-excitation [27]. F1 score is a measure of the model's accuracy and it is calculated from the positive predictive value and the sensitivity of the test.…”
Section: Data Analysis Major Electrocardiographic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final report with the ECG abnormalities was obtained by imputing the classifier results for recognition of each ECG abnormality. The classification model was tested on 4557 medical reports manually labeled by two cardiologists with 80.7% positive predictive value, 94.3% sensitivity and 87.0% F1 score for AF; 86.1% positive predictive value, 95.4% sensitivity and 90.9% F1 score for RBBB; 91.4% positive predictive value, 86.0% sensitivity and 88.6% F1 score for LBBB; 75.6% positive predictive value, 93.5% sensitivity and 83.6% F1 score for AVB, and 96.7% positive predictive value, 96.7% sensitivity and 96.7% F1 score for ventricular pre-excitation [27]. F1 score is a measure of the model's accuracy and it is calculated from the positive predictive value and the sensitivity of the test.…”
Section: Data Analysis Major Electrocardiographic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a self-supervised classification model that is specifically developed for clinical reports written in Portuguese. An earlier version of this model, as well as a subset of the results, was presented at KDMILe 2020 and this paper is an extension of the one that was presented at the conference [Pedrosa et al 2020]. Our method estimates a label from each textual report, indicating what are the diagnoses that are contained in the report.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%