2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Breast Volume Scanning Versus Conventional Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…retraction sign in the coronal plane for breast cancer). Indeed, previous studies have shown a similar diagnostic performance between AWUS and HHUS for detection and diagnosis of breast lesions as well as in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions [5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The image quality of AWUS should be guaranteed for use in clinical practice, thus necessitating a comparison of the image quality between AWUS and HHUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…retraction sign in the coronal plane for breast cancer). Indeed, previous studies have shown a similar diagnostic performance between AWUS and HHUS for detection and diagnosis of breast lesions as well as in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions [5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The image quality of AWUS should be guaranteed for use in clinical practice, thus necessitating a comparison of the image quality between AWUS and HHUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Several studies have assessed the application of an automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in screening dense breasts. [11][12][13][14] In addition, several studies recently assessed the application of an ABVS in breast lesion diagnostics. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In one study, the diagnostic performance of the ABVS as a secondlook US modality after preoperative MRI was reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason for the low agreement was that only 25 lesions presented discontinuous hypoechoic rims. For masses, retraction phenomenon caused by tumor infiltration and surrounding tissue response changes (10) had high specificity (91.1%) and was a strong predictor of malignancy. A slightly lower sensitivity (42.3%) of retraction phenomenon was found in our study, compared to the previously reported values (55-91%) (6, 8-11, 13-15, 27) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A skipping sign, also called a partial deletion artifact or skip artifact (3,10,12), is caused by the disruption of the scanning process. It indicates the presence of a palpable lesion, nipple, or dense breast tissue, and could sometimes affect image interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation