2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms: A moth flame optimization based ELM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, breast cancer is the most common cause of death among women worldwide. The scientific reports show that the early treatment of breast cancer increases the survival rate of the patients [ 1 , 2 ]. Several imaging modalities are applied for breast cancer detection like X-ray, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), histology, positron emission tomography (PET), and computerized tomography (CT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, breast cancer is the most common cause of death among women worldwide. The scientific reports show that the early treatment of breast cancer increases the survival rate of the patients [ 1 , 2 ]. Several imaging modalities are applied for breast cancer detection like X-ray, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), histology, positron emission tomography (PET), and computerized tomography (CT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discovered that the proposed model yields better results compared to the traditional FD and LBP features. The previous study [46] obtained 100% sensitivity, and the previous study [58] gives 100% accuracy in the Mini-MIAS dataset. Table 9 depicts that our proposed model yields better sensitivity and accuracy compared to previous studies [57,58] in the DDSM dataset.…”
Section: Comparision With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The previous study [46] obtained 100% sensitivity, and the previous study [58] gives 100% accuracy in the Mini-MIAS dataset. Table 9 depicts that our proposed model yields better sensitivity and accuracy compared to previous studies [57,58] in the DDSM dataset. In the same trend, the previous study [63] gives 100% sensitivity and our proposed model gives 99.79% in the DDSM dataset due to using a small set of mammogram images.…”
Section: Comparision With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…DBN can only be pre-trained until the last hidden layer, but the weights are selected randomly among the output layer and the previous hidden layer. Another study by Muduli et al [ 91 ] performed feature reduction and classification by fusing the extreme learning machine and the moth flame optimization technique (MFO-ELM) for BrC classification. The feature reduction may lead to data loss.…”
Section: Breast-cancer-diagnosis Methods Based On Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%