Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Noisy User-Generated Text (W-Nut 2020) 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Assessment of Noisy Crowdsourced Free-text Answers for Hindi in Low Resource Setting

Abstract: The requirement of performing assessments continually on a larger scale necessitates the implementation of automated systems for evaluation of the learners' responses to free-text questions. We target children of age group 8-14 years and use an ASR integrated assessment app to crowdsource learners' responses to free text questions in Hindi. The app helped collect 39641 user answers to 35 different questions of Science topics. Since the users are young children from rural India and may not be well-equipped with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sjöblom et al (2018) defined noises for subtitles including misspellings, misalignments, and sentence segmentation errors. Agarwal et al (2020) summarized noise types in free-text answers written by Hindi children, such as punctuations, emojis, translated/transliterated text, missing space between words, and so on. Some other works focused on orthographical noises (Karpukhin et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Studies On Noisy Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sjöblom et al (2018) defined noises for subtitles including misspellings, misalignments, and sentence segmentation errors. Agarwal et al (2020) summarized noise types in free-text answers written by Hindi children, such as punctuations, emojis, translated/transliterated text, missing space between words, and so on. Some other works focused on orthographical noises (Karpukhin et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Studies On Noisy Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%