1985
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/213.4.971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated analysis of objective-prism spectra - I. Quasar detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of the TRES instrument allowed us to define the aperture trace for each fiber using the high signal-to-noise flat fields, which were then used to extract the target and calibration spectra, employing the "optimal" (in a least squares sense) weighting scheme of Hewett et al (1985). The spectra were wavelength-calibrated using the standard ecidentify procedure, which employs the (known) dispersion relation of theéchelle to solve for a wavelength solution over all orders of the spectrum simultaneously.…”
Section: Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the TRES instrument allowed us to define the aperture trace for each fiber using the high signal-to-noise flat fields, which were then used to extract the target and calibration spectra, employing the "optimal" (in a least squares sense) weighting scheme of Hewett et al (1985). The spectra were wavelength-calibrated using the standard ecidentify procedure, which employs the (known) dispersion relation of theéchelle to solve for a wavelength solution over all orders of the spectrum simultaneously.…”
Section: Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1 ) Reference Cross-section model Comment Hewett et al (1985) average along dispersion assumes no order tilt Horne (1986), Robertson (1986) polynomials along dispersion assumes small order tilt Urry & Reichert (1988) Gaussian function Marsh (1989) coupled polynomials along dispersion employs spatial subpixel grid Piskunov & Valenti (2002) penalised functions in spatial direction employs spatial subpixel grid This work (master flat) requires stabilised spectrograph where wavelength λ and the positions x and y in the detector plane are continuous variables (the hat indicates the model or best estimate, while without the hat it indicates observations with noise: S (x, y) =Ŝ (x, y) + σ(x, y)). Furthermore, the spectrum is recorded and binned by detector pixels.…”
Section: Principle Of Flat-relative Optimal Extraction (Fox)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no or slow order tilt, the profile might be reconstructed by averaging (Hewett et al 1985) or fitting low-order polynomials in the dispersion direction (Horne 1986), respectively. For echelle spectrographs, this situation occurs only in small sections of the orders, but not in general.…”
Section: Conceptual Comparison With Other Optimal Extraction Implemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides a coordinate list which is then fed to the APM scanner and the spectra of some 30000 to 60000 objects per plate are then automatically extracted. The extracted spectral data are analysed in order to identify the quasar candidates using techniques similar to those developed at the APM facility by Hewett et al (1985) for the lower redshift objects (z < 3) in the IllaJ surveys. We have developed an algorithm to detect the higher redshift objects (2.5 < z < 4) and other non-UVX quasars based on a median template method.…”
Section: A P M Scanning and Object Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%