2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-03951-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated analysis of microplastics based on vibrational spectroscopy: are we measuring the same metrics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach couples mid-IR QCLs with a thermoelectrically-cooled single-channel detector for rapid chemical imaging with a fully automated workflow. This approach has been compared with FPA-FTIR imaging for microplastic detection 15 . As these FTIR and emerging QCL-based systems detect directly the transmitted or reflected IR radiation of the sample, they can be called direct IR approaches that suffer—besides the above-described resolution in the micrometer range – from Mie scattering and anomalous dispersion effects, in particular for sample sizes near the IR wavelengths 12 to 5.5 µm corresponding to the most informative spectral fingerprint range 800 to 1800 cm −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach couples mid-IR QCLs with a thermoelectrically-cooled single-channel detector for rapid chemical imaging with a fully automated workflow. This approach has been compared with FPA-FTIR imaging for microplastic detection 15 . As these FTIR and emerging QCL-based systems detect directly the transmitted or reflected IR radiation of the sample, they can be called direct IR approaches that suffer—besides the above-described resolution in the micrometer range – from Mie scattering and anomalous dispersion effects, in particular for sample sizes near the IR wavelengths 12 to 5.5 µm corresponding to the most informative spectral fingerprint range 800 to 1800 cm −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier transform IR (FTIR), including attenuated total reflection-FTIR (ATR-FTIR) and micro-FTIR, can detect MPs above 10 μm, while Raman can detect MPs above 1 μm. Moreover, focal plane array-FTIR imaging can effectively detect the MPs larger than 20 μm [ 30 ], while Raman imaging can effectively identify MPs larger than 1 μm [ 31 ]. In addition to the inherent chemical information, Raman and IR spectroscopy combined with photothermal techniques provided high-resolution imaging for submicron-scale organic particle determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a pressing need to explore and develop strategies to accurately and consistently identify plastics using imperfect spectroscopic data. Such strategies should be developed in parallel for both Raman and FTIR spectroscopies as their varied strengths and limitations lead to differences in quantitative capabilities …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such strategies should be developed in parallel for both Raman and FTIR spectroscopies as their varied strengths and limitations lead to differences in quantitative capabilities. 35 The rapid development of machine-learning (ML) algorithms provides many accessible tools that are being explored to improve microplastic analysis protocols. 36 An ML classification model based on the random forest (RF) algorithm trained on 306 Raman spectra from the open-source SLOPP and SLOPP-E databases was found to be capable of 89% classification accuracy.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%