2020
DOI: 10.18280/ts.370103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Analysis of Leaf Shape, Texture, and Color Features for Plant Classification

Abstract: The main purpose of this research is to apply image processing for plant identification in agriculture. This application field has so far received less attention rather than the other image processing applications domains. This is called the plant identification system. In the plant identification system, the conventional technique is dealt with looking at the leaves and fruits of the plants. However, it does not take into account as a cost effective approach because of its time consumption. The image processi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HOG with SVM [1] 97.00 C-SIFT with KD tree [1] 98.00 MSER with KD tree [1] 90.00 KNN [2] 98.93 ROM-LBP [3] 98.94 Cosine KNN [4] 95.50 SVM [4] 89.90 Patternnet Neural Network [4] 72.20 PBPSO with Decision Tree [6] 98.58 PBPSO with SVM [6] 96.12 PBPSO with Naive Bayes [6] 92.01 PBPSO with KNN [6] 94.89 Random Forest [7] 84.11 SVM [7] 79.05 Logistic Regression [7] 84.11 KNN [7] 80.10 Naive Bayes [7] 72.25 CNN [9] 87.92 D-Leaf with ANN [10] 94.63 VGG16 and LDA [12] 99.10 VGG16 [12] 99.11 CNN-RNN [12] 99.11 VGG19 with Logistic Regression [13] 96.25 SWP-LeafNet [17] 99.67 Table 3 presents a comparison of different methods for plant leaf classification on the Folio Leaf dataset, which is characterized by an average of 14 training samples per class. Consequently, the achieved accuracy of all methods was relatively lower.…”
Section: Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HOG with SVM [1] 97.00 C-SIFT with KD tree [1] 98.00 MSER with KD tree [1] 90.00 KNN [2] 98.93 ROM-LBP [3] 98.94 Cosine KNN [4] 95.50 SVM [4] 89.90 Patternnet Neural Network [4] 72.20 PBPSO with Decision Tree [6] 98.58 PBPSO with SVM [6] 96.12 PBPSO with Naive Bayes [6] 92.01 PBPSO with KNN [6] 94.89 Random Forest [7] 84.11 SVM [7] 79.05 Logistic Regression [7] 84.11 KNN [7] 80.10 Naive Bayes [7] 72.25 CNN [9] 87.92 D-Leaf with ANN [10] 94.63 VGG16 and LDA [12] 99.10 VGG16 [12] 99.11 CNN-RNN [12] 99.11 VGG19 with Logistic Regression [13] 96.25 SWP-LeafNet [17] 99.67 Table 3 presents a comparison of different methods for plant leaf classification on the Folio Leaf dataset, which is characterized by an average of 14 training samples per class. Consequently, the achieved accuracy of all methods was relatively lower.…”
Section: Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula (22) shows that the value of VP t can be obtained by weighted average operation on b t , b t -1 , ..., b ti , using the coefficients ξ, ξ(1ξ), ξ(1ξ) 2 , ... respectively. Since the weight coefficient attenuates in geometric progressions, the data samples with large coefficients approach each other, while those with small coefficient move away from each other.…”
Section: Crop Yield Modeling Based On Multiple Regression Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent agriculture, which integrates information technology, sensing technology, and wireless communication technology, can achieve smart sensing, transmission, and analysis of the information in each link of agricultural planting. The numerous links, various plants, and diverse sensors involved in agricultural planting undermine the efficiency and reliability of data collection and storage [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying plants was an essential and challenging task. Leaf shape description was the key problem in leaf identification [11], [12]. To date, several shape characteristics have been derived to explain the form of the leaf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%