2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-017-1845-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated algorithm for counting microbleeds in patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations

Abstract: Introduction Familial cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) patients present with multiple lesions that can grow both in number and size over time and are reliably detected on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Manual counting of lesions is arduous and subject to high variability. We aimed to develop an automated algorithm for counting CCM microbleeds (lesions <5mm in diameter) on SWI images. Methods Fifty-seven familial CCM type-1 patients were included in this institutional review board-approved study.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 shows the comparison of false positives per individual as well as a comparison as per microbleeds. [28] 86.5 44.9 1.5 Dou et al [29] 89.4 7.7 0.9 Chen et al [21] 89.1 6.4 -Douh et al [23] 93.16 2.74 -Heuvel et al [30] 89 25.9 0.29 Proposed Method 99.9 1.5 -…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 shows the comparison of false positives per individual as well as a comparison as per microbleeds. [28] 86.5 44.9 1.5 Dou et al [29] 89.4 7.7 0.9 Chen et al [21] 89.1 6.4 -Douh et al [23] 93.16 2.74 -Heuvel et al [30] 89 25.9 0.29 Proposed Method 99.9 1.5 -…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, there was high interobserver agreement in lesion counts (pairwise correlation >0.95) between the 2 neuroradiologists. 16 However, there are several limitations including (1) the majority of patients have the CCM1 genetic mutation, thus we are unable to assess and compare the ICH rate in those who harbor CCM2 or CCM3 genetic risk factors; (2) the small number of ICH events prohibited us from assessing additional ICH risk factors such as imaging characteristics; (3) MRI technical heterogeneity across recruitment sites may limit the assessment of accurate lesion burden particularly with respect to smaller lesions; and (4) our results may be subject to selection bias, which may affect ICH rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCM lesions were manually counted to obtain counts of total and large lesions (≥5 mm at maximal diameter, defined as the greatest trans axial dimension measured on the T2‐weighted images, including the hypointense rim) as previously described. 15 , 16 Prior history of ICH and subsequent symptomatic ICH during follow‐up were reported by patients and/or documented in medical records using standard definition of symptomatic hemorrhage. 17 Not all cases were able to be verified by MRI; for example, MRIs performed at outside hospitals may have not been available for review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWI sequences provide information on venous vasculature, hemorrhage, iron deposits, and very small vascular structures within the central nervous system (including brain tumors) [4,[15][16][17]. Fractal geometry has been demonstrated to offer appropriate tools to quantify irregular-shaped biological objects, including microvascular and SWI patterns [8], that can be used in automated algorithms for counting microbleeds [18], quantitative susceptibility mapping [19], percentage-wise quantification of intratumoral-susceptibility signals [20], local image variance [21] and other quantitative methodologies [16]. The fractal dimension, the most used parameter in fractal geometry, has been shown as a reliable numerical index to objectively quantify geometrical complexity of microvascular patterns in brain tumors [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%