2017
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008216.pub5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy for nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

Abstract: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy for nonrhabdomyosarcoma so tissue sarcomas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, HDCT in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas results in no significant improvement in outcome compared with standard-dose chemotherapy. [17][18][19][20] De Giorgi et al have investigated HDCT in children with relapsed extragonadal GCT. 10 In this paper, 23 patients with extragonadal GCT,…”
Section: F I G U R E 2 Os Of Relapsed and Refractory Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HDCT in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas results in no significant improvement in outcome compared with standard-dose chemotherapy. [17][18][19][20] De Giorgi et al have investigated HDCT in children with relapsed extragonadal GCT. 10 In this paper, 23 patients with extragonadal GCT,…”
Section: F I G U R E 2 Os Of Relapsed and Refractory Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used for the treatment of myeloma and lymphoma (20) as well as some solid tumours (21). ASCT patients are generally thought to have less viral infections than allo-SCT patients and, apart systematic CMV viraemia measurement, other herpesviruses are not regularly monitored in ASCT patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its 2011 version, the review contained 54 included studies, 401 excluded studies and 46 additional references (https ://doi.org/10.1002/14651 858.CD008 216.pub3). In the 2017 versionPeinemann et al (2017), this changed to 2 included studies, 65 excluded studies and 65 additional references (https ://doi.org/10.1002/14651 858.CD008 216.pub5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%