1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100138691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autograft ossicle selection in cholesteatomatous ear disease: histopathological considerations

Abstract: In order to determine whether selection of autograft ossicles in cholesteatomatous ear disease should be based on upon their apperance under the surgical operating microscope, we studied the histopathological features of 113 such ossicles. We attempted to correlate the extent of erosion of the ossicle, as noted under the surgical operating microscope, with their histopathological apperance. There were 60 mallei and 53 incudes. Seventy-nine ossicles were eroded and 34 were intact. The commonest abnormality note… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though ossicular necrosis is more in tubotympanic otitis media, several studies [11,12] show variable percentage. Incidence of ossicular involvement of even up to [90% in atticoantral otitis media has been reported [13]. No ossicular involvement by squamous epithelium/cholesteatoma similar to our study was also reported by Rupa et al [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Though ossicular necrosis is more in tubotympanic otitis media, several studies [11,12] show variable percentage. Incidence of ossicular involvement of even up to [90% in atticoantral otitis media has been reported [13]. No ossicular involvement by squamous epithelium/cholesteatoma similar to our study was also reported by Rupa et al [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the previously reported case, there was no difference in the audiograms performed during the pre-and post-operative periods. The gap of 15 dB in both observations was attributed to the absence of the short process of the incus and incudal ligaments (8). However, in our case, we encountered the opposite finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, their use in patients with cholesteatoma has been limited by the risk of harbouring residual disease. The changes in the middle ear ossicles in cholestematous ears have been described in several histological studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, the deeper invasion of cholesteatoma into the middle ear ossicles has never been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their use in cholesteatoma ears has been limited by the possibility of harbouring within them residual cholesteatoma. There appears to be some evidence that the microscopic residuum of squamous cell epithelium in the ossicles could lead to reimplantation of the cholesteatoma [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The risk of cholesteatoma transmission using the autologous ossicles is widely accepted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%