2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2017.7944458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autofocused compressive SAR imaging based on the alternating direction method of multipliers

Abstract: Abstract-We present an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based autofocused Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging method in the presence of unknown 1-D phase errors in the phase history domain, with undersampled measurements. We formulate the problem as one of joint image formation and phase error estimation. We assume sparsity of strong scatterers in the image domain, and as such use sparsity priors for reconstruction. The algorithm uses p-norm minimization (p ≤ 1) [8] with an improvement by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Onhon et al uses the pth power of the approximate l p norm as the regularization term and an alternating minimization framework to solve the problem [12]. There are also various methods addressing the problem in a compressive sensing context, such as the majorization-minimization-based method [13,14], iteratively re-weighted augmented Lagrangian-based method [15,16] and conjugate gradient-based method with a cost function involving hybrid regularization terms (approximate l 1 norm and approximate total variation regularization) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Onhon et al uses the pth power of the approximate l p norm as the regularization term and an alternating minimization framework to solve the problem [12]. There are also various methods addressing the problem in a compressive sensing context, such as the majorization-minimization-based method [13,14], iteratively re-weighted augmented Lagrangian-based method [15,16] and conjugate gradient-based method with a cost function involving hybrid regularization terms (approximate l 1 norm and approximate total variation regularization) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many sparsity-driven algorithms [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have been proposed to solve the defocusing problem and achieve effective performance. However, the references [28][29][30][31][32][33] cannot fully formulate the motion error and adopt the approximate expression so that the error is not removed. Reference 34 integrated with the deep SAR imaging algorithm to remove the motion error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many sparsitydriven algorithms [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have been proposed to solve the defocusing problem and achieve an effective performance. However, the references [28][29][30][31][32][33] do not fully formulate the motion error and adopt an approximate expression so that the error is not removed. The reference [34] integrated the deep SAR imaging algorithm to remove the motion error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%