2012
DOI: 10.4103/0973-029x.92965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autofluorescence spectroscopy of betel quid chewers and oral submucous fibrosis: A pilot study

Abstract: Context:Oral lesions related to the use of commercially available tobacco (gutkha) is going to pose a major challenge for health care providers in India. Therefore, techniques that are useful for mass screening of the public for early identification of pre-cancerous lesions and conditions are necessary to overcome this challenge.Aims:To identify the differences in autofluorescence spectra of normal oral mucosa, mucosa of betel quid chewers, and mucosa of oral sub mucous fibrosis.Materials and Methods:Group I c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autofluorescence imaging (AFI) is an alternate detection technique using changes in the radiant exitance of oral tissue fluorescence when illuminated at 400–410 [2830] to discriminate potential oral malignant lesions, removing the requirement of the lesion being visible [19, 28, 3141]. Increasing dysplasia results in a decreased fluorescence signal from changes in endogenous fluorophores and increased absorption from hemoglobin [29, 33, 34, 4244].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autofluorescence imaging (AFI) is an alternate detection technique using changes in the radiant exitance of oral tissue fluorescence when illuminated at 400–410 [2830] to discriminate potential oral malignant lesions, removing the requirement of the lesion being visible [19, 28, 3141]. Increasing dysplasia results in a decreased fluorescence signal from changes in endogenous fluorophores and increased absorption from hemoglobin [29, 33, 34, 4244].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 330 nm excitation applied to OSF mucosa had a significantly higher 380 nm emission peak and a significantly lower 460 nm emission peak than those of normal oral mucosa [105]. There were significant statistical differences in the emission peaks between normal and OSF patients and between betel quid chewers and OSF patients [106]. After the OSF was treated, the mucosa presented with relatively lower intensity at~385 nm and comparatively higher intensity at~440 nm than untreated OSF mucosa [107].…”
Section: Instrumentation For Osf Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%