2016
DOI: 10.2174/1574893611666160212235117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoFlow, a Versatile Workflow Engine Illustrated by Assembling an Optimised de novo Transcriptome for a Non-Model Species, such as Faba Bean (Vicia faba)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 a for the Arabidopsis datasets. It has been constructed using AutoFlow [ 29 ], a workflow manager developed in Ruby in our laboratory. The workflow receives as input files the raw reads and the transcriptome, both in Fasta format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 a for the Arabidopsis datasets. It has been constructed using AutoFlow [ 29 ], a workflow manager developed in Ruby in our laboratory. The workflow receives as input files the raw reads and the transcriptome, both in Fasta format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of unknown transcripts was 60% in v 1.1, compared to 65% in v 1.0 and 52% in Kaur et al [ 23 ]. This indicates that the update of sequences and software in the workflow described in Seoane et al [ 36 ] clearly improved the faba bean transcriptome. These transcripts can be faba/legume-specific transcripts (without a clear orthologue in the databases) or assembling artefacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Approximately half of the sequences (16,567,244) belong to the 29H parental line and the other half (16,455,916) to line Vf136. A total of 30,907,202 (93.59%) useful reads were submitted to different assembly procedures as described in Seoane et al [ 36 ]. Additionally, 105,094 sequences from ENA and Kaur et al [ 23 ] were pre-processed to provide 87,269 useful reads to be assembled and merged with the previous assemblies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations