Autoerotic asphyxia: A case report

Johnstone, J M; Huws, Rhodri

doi:10.1080/00926239708403936

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Single-case studies are an appropriate method for the exploration of unusual or extreme cases (Yin, 2014) as evidenced by several forensic studies (e.g. Bowden, 1996;Brankley et al, 2014;Greenall, 2004;Johnstone & Huws, 1997;Karakasi et al, 2017;Logan, 2014;Loza & Hanna, 2006;McClellan, 2006).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A sexual murder prevented? A case study of evidence-based practice

Greenall

Millington

2021

The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A sexual murder prevented? A case study of evidence-based practice

Greenall

Millington

2021

The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Erotic (and autoerotic) asphyxia or hypoxyphilia (breath play) may result in death, yet may be practiced by individuals with diverse demographic characteristics (Cooper, 1996;Johnstone & Huws, 1997). In his popular introductory book, SM101, Wiseman (1996) wrote that after consultation with numerous physicians and medical personnel, his stance is that breath play is always unsafe.…”

Section: Assessment For Addiction and Extreme Casesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Different (Painful¡) Strokes for Different Folks: A General Overview of Sexual Sadomasochism (SM) and its Diversity

Williams

2006

Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous attempts are more common in girls and among suicides suffering from a mood disorder at the time of their death. Suicide must be distinguished from autoerotic asphyxia, which is induction of oxygen deficiency to enhance sexual excitement and orgasm (Johnstone and Huws, 1997). However, autoerotic deaths in teenagers are rare (Shaffer et al, 1996a).…”

Section: Clinical Characteristics Of Teenagers Who Commit Suicidementioning

confidence: 99%

Suicidal ideation and behaviour

Korczak¹

2015

Paediatrics &Amp; Child Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suicidal behavior is a matter of great concern for clinicians who deal with the mental health problems of children and adolescents. The incidence of suicide attempts reaches a peak during the mid-adolescent years, and mortality from suicide, which increases steadily through the teen years, is the third leading cause of death at that age. Clinicians need to know how to identify those at greatest risk for suicide from among the large number of suicide attempters who have a benign prognosis; how to provide treatment for the suicidal patient; how to advise and counsel the child, adolescent, and parental survivors of individual suicides; and how to provide expert consultation to educational and public health authorities on appropriate and inappropriate directions for suicide prevention programs. The parameter was written to aid clinicians in the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents exhibiting suicidal behavior or harboring suicidal ideation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis summary provides an overview of the assessment and treatment recommendations contained in the Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Suicidal Behavior. This summary includes many of the most important points and recommendations that are in these practice guidelines. However, the treatment and assessment of suicidal patients requires the consideration of many important factors that cannot be conveyed fully in a summary, and the reader is encouraged to review the entire document. Each recommendation in the executive summary is identified as falling into one of the following categories of endorsement, indicated by an abbreviation in brackets following the statement. These categories indicate the degree of importance or certainty of each recommendation."Minimal Standards" [MS] are recommendations that are based on substantial empirical evidence (such as well controlled, double-blind trials) or overwhelming clinical consensus. Minimal standards are expected to apply more than 95% of the time, i.e., in almost all cases. When the practitioner does not follow this standard in a particular case, the medical record should indicate the reason."Clinical Guidelines" [CG] are recommendations that are based on empirical evidence (such as open trials, case studies) and/or strong clinical consensus. Clinical guidelines apply approximately 75% of the time. These practices should always be considered by the clinician, but there are exceptions to their application."Options" [OP] are practices that are acceptable but not required. There may be insufficient empirical evidence to support recommending these practices as minimal standards or clinical guidelines. In some cases they may be the perfect thing

show abstract

Autoerotic asphyxia: A case report

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

A sexual murder prevented? A case study of evidence-based practice

A sexual murder prevented? A case study of evidence-based practice

Different (Painful¡) Strokes for Different Folks: A General Overview of Sexual Sadomasochism (SM) and its Diversity

Suicidal ideation and behaviour

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About