The 8th International Conference on Time Series and Forecasting 2022
DOI: 10.3390/engproc2022018023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection in an Industrial Multivariate Time Series Dataset

Abstract: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After collecting the data, a convolutional-based encoder-decoder network to determine where anomalies exist in the workpiece was trained. The ability to detect anomalies in time series by applying convolutions was successfully demonstrated by multiple publications [1,[7][8][9]]. An undercomplete autoencoder is a feedforward deep neural network that tries to reconstruct its input 𝒙 ϵ ℝ 𝑝 and consists of two parts being an encoder and a decoder [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After collecting the data, a convolutional-based encoder-decoder network to determine where anomalies exist in the workpiece was trained. The ability to detect anomalies in time series by applying convolutions was successfully demonstrated by multiple publications [1,[7][8][9]]. An undercomplete autoencoder is a feedforward deep neural network that tries to reconstruct its input 𝒙 ϵ ℝ 𝑝 and consists of two parts being an encoder and a decoder [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In process anomaly detection is an important topic in machine learning research and has a huge potential to further decrease manufacturing costs on the way towards zerodefect manufacturing [1]. With regards to milling lots of research has been done to detect anomalous cutting tool behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction loss is the term for this function. Typical examples are mean squared error and cross-entropy loss [ 64 , 65 ]. The breakdown process and architecture for the proposed model are described in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Proposed Anomaly Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…embedding 𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 , with 𝑑 < 𝑛; the decoder then tries to reconstruct 𝑥 from 𝑧, producing an output vector 𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 . They have been used for dimensionality reduction [57][58][59], classification [60][61][62], and anomaly detection [63,64]. We implemented a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) coupled with an LSTM backend, following an idea similar to that described in [65]: first, the autoencoder was trained to learn good embeddings of the input data; then, we then passed these learned embeddings to an LSTM architecture like the one described in the above section.…”
Section: Cae-lstmmentioning
confidence: 99%