Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2022
DOI: 10.1364/cleo_si.2022.sw4e.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoencoder-Optimized Geometric Constellation Shaping for Unamplified Coherent Optical Links

Abstract: Using end-to-end deep learning, we experimentally demonstrate the optimized design of geometric constellation shaping for coherent unamplified links. A power budget gain of more than 2 dB is demonstrated for 8-ary constellations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41,42 The joint optimization can focus on several aspects of the signaling, e.g. constellation shaping and decision regions, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] pulse shaping and receiver filtering, 41,42 etc. Similarly, the optimization objective can be varied from absolute system throughput [43][44][45][46][47] to robustness to uncertainty in channel 41,48 or transciever 50,51 parameters.…”
Section: End-to-end Learning Of Phase-noise Robust Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41,42 The joint optimization can focus on several aspects of the signaling, e.g. constellation shaping and decision regions, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] pulse shaping and receiver filtering, 41,42 etc. Similarly, the optimization objective can be varied from absolute system throughput [43][44][45][46][47] to robustness to uncertainty in channel 41,48 or transciever 50,51 parameters.…”
Section: End-to-end Learning Of Phase-noise Robust Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constellation shaping and decision regions, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] pulse shaping and receiver filtering, 41,42 etc. Similarly, the optimization objective can be varied from absolute system throughput [43][44][45][46][47] to robustness to uncertainty in channel 41,48 or transciever 50,51 parameters. The challenge of applying end-toend learning mainly consists of requiring a differentiable transmitter-to-receiver model in order to optimize the encoder-decoder pair through gradient-based methods.…”
Section: End-to-end Learning Of Phase-noise Robust Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G EOMETRIC constellation shaping has become attractive in communication systems due to its flexible design for different impairments [1], e.g., tolerance to laser phase noise [2], [3], fiber Kerr nonlinearities [4]- [6], transceiver components impairments [7], and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) channels [8]. In contrast to probabilistic constellation shaping (PCS) [9], [10], geometric constellation shaping (GCS) modifies the Euclidean geometry of the constellation points while keeping their occurrence probability uniform [11], [12,Ch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-to-end learning, which was introduced in [8], utilizes an autoencoder (AE) [9] to optimize the communication system and it has gathered traction as a method to approach GCS due to its versatility to the employed channel model. Endto-end learning has proven to be effective for GCS in optical communication systems [6], [10]- [15], mainly focusing on the mitigation of the nonlinear effects of the optical fiber. Geometric constellation shaping considering the BPS algorithm was explored in [16], [17], where a constellation was optimized to be robust to channel uncertainties with BPS at the receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%