2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.03779
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoencoder-based Unsupervised Intrusion Detection using Multi-Scale Convolutional Recurrent Networks

Abstract: The massive growth of network traffic data leads to a large volume of datasets. Labeling these datasets for identifying intrusion attacks is very laborious and error-prone. Furthermore, network traffic data have complex time-varying non-linear relationships. The existing state-of-the-art intrusion detection solutions use a combination of various supervised approaches along with fused features subsets based on correlations in traffic data. These solutions often require high computational cost, manual support in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Table 14 shows the anomaly detection ability of some studies tested on the UNSW-NB15 dataset. In particular, the 2-Stage Ensemble [18], the LogAE-XGBoost [48], and MSCNN-LSTM-AE [49] achieve higher accuracy results (91.27%, 95.11%, and 89%, respectively) than our ANC with the UNSW-NB15 dataset (87.49%). However, our system outperforms the rest.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Table 14 shows the anomaly detection ability of some studies tested on the UNSW-NB15 dataset. In particular, the 2-Stage Ensemble [18], the LogAE-XGBoost [48], and MSCNN-LSTM-AE [49] achieve higher accuracy results (91.27%, 95.11%, and 89%, respectively) than our ANC with the UNSW-NB15 dataset (87.49%). However, our system outperforms the rest.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Regarding the precision parameters, our system is better than studies in [50] only. In contrast, the ANC with UNSW-NB15 technique on the FPGA-based ADNN system achieves a higher recall value than work in [18,29,49,50]. Finally, for the CIC-IDS2017 dataset, most of the machine learning and deep learning algorithms achieve impressive results, as shown in Table 15.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, there arises a necessity to convert these one-dimensional features into a two-dimensional matrix. By leveraging 2D CNN, we can capture relationships and spatial dependencies that span across diverse feature combinations [40]. After completing the aforementioned data preprocessing steps, the NSL-KDD dataset consists of 121 numerical features that are reshaped into an 11 × 11 × 1 matrix.…”
Section: D Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the model functioned most effectively when it split the data in a 70/30 train/test split ratio. Singh and Jang-Jaccard (2022) [18] created a hybrid autoencoder model dubbed MSCNN-LSTM-AE. This model found anomalies in network traffic by utilizing a combination of a multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN) and LSTM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%