The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2009.2035628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autocorrelation-Based Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed algorithm is also compared with those from the energy detector, the covariance detector, and the cyclicautocorrelation detector. They show results that algorithm outperforms the covariance detector and the cyclic autocorrelation detector [10].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The performance of the proposed algorithm is also compared with those from the energy detector, the covariance detector, and the cyclicautocorrelation detector. They show results that algorithm outperforms the covariance detector and the cyclic autocorrelation detector [10].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this context, authors in [112] propose a simple Correlation Sum (CorrSum) detector exploiting both energy and correlation parameters for the improved sensing performance assuming that correlation is real and extend to the scenario with the knowledge of correlation distribution information in [113]. Further, a CFAR detection algorithm has been studied in [114] using the estimated autocorrelation of the received signal and its performance is shown to be better than the covariance detector and the cyclic autocorrelation detector.…”
Section: B Autocorrelation Based Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although energy and cyclostationary detectors are widely used in the field of spectrum sensing, various other methods are also proposed [14][15][16]. The goodness of fit (GoF) algorithm introduced in [14] compares the empirical distribution of the received samples to a known distribution of the noise (when PU is idle).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming the oversampling aspect of the baseband received signal (i.e., number of samples per symbols N s ≥ 2), the autocorrelation for a non-zero lag only vanishes when the PU signal is absent and the channel is only occupied by a white noise [16]. The corresponding test statistic combines linearly the autocorrelation measures for different non-zero lags before making a decision on the PU status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation