2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.2995109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autocorrelation Aided Random Forest Classifier-Based Bearing Fault Detection Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roy et al propose an autocorrelation-based methodology for feature extraction from a raw signal and then use the random forest classifier for fault classification. They achieve comparable accuracies to the deep learning methods discussed earlier [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Roy et al propose an autocorrelation-based methodology for feature extraction from a raw signal and then use the random forest classifier for fault classification. They achieve comparable accuracies to the deep learning methods discussed earlier [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…to be selected when debugging the model, and the selection of the hyper-parameters is often complicated, and it usually requires experienced engineers to be able to produce better prediction results. RF, on the other hand, as an ensemble learning algorithm based on decision trees, is widely used not only to solve classification and regression problems, [23][24][25][26][27] but also to handle anomaly detection and clustering problems. [28][29][30][31][32] Relative to artificial neural network modeling, RF modeling is much simpler and only requires to adjust the number of learners, the depth of the tree and the maximum number of features to be able to adjust the better prediction results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the artificial neural network (ANN) is a popular supervised learning algorithm, it is vulnerable to causing over-fitting and affecting the generalization ability and the diagnosis results. Therefore, the random forest (RF) algorithm is adopted to train the CSFDD classifier, which is not easy to fall into over-fitting due to the introduction of two randomness (random samples, random features) (Roy et al, 2020;Fezai et al, 2021). Meanwhile, the current fault texture features are proposed to train the RF CSFDD classifier, which can improve the feature diversity and the diagnosis accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%