2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01672-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoclave sterilization of an in-house 3D-printed polylactic acid piece: biological safety and heat-induced deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aguado-Maestro et al (2021) compared the bacterial growth on 3D printed PLA cylinders after sterilization using ethylene oxide, gas plasma and autoclave sterilizations, reporting the effectiveness of ethylene and autoclave approaches, although the latter distorted the cylinders due to high temperatures in the sterilization cycle. However, Ferràs-Tarragó et al (2021) successfully sterilized 3D printed anatomical models without significant deformation after autoclave processing. At the intersection between conventional and AM resides the inquiry about the need for sterilization, given that the latter is associated with high-temperature processing (Savaris et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aguado-Maestro et al (2021) compared the bacterial growth on 3D printed PLA cylinders after sterilization using ethylene oxide, gas plasma and autoclave sterilizations, reporting the effectiveness of ethylene and autoclave approaches, although the latter distorted the cylinders due to high temperatures in the sterilization cycle. However, Ferràs-Tarragó et al (2021) successfully sterilized 3D printed anatomical models without significant deformation after autoclave processing. At the intersection between conventional and AM resides the inquiry about the need for sterilization, given that the latter is associated with high-temperature processing (Savaris et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Yet, only a few studies have evaluated the poststerilization effects on patient guides, [21][22][23][24][25][26] the majority of which focus on steam methods using polymers such as polylactic acid and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. [21][22][23][24][25] However, these polymers are not always considered biocompatible and the long-term effects of contact with patient tissues are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 While effective sterilization is critical for patient-specific instrumentation, there are concerns regarding the possibility of dimensional changes during the process, which could have a deleterious impact on the accuracy of implant placement and, therefore, on surgical outcome. 20 Yet, only a few studies have evaluated the poststerilization effects on patient guides, [21][22][23][24][25][26] the majority of which focus on steam methods using polymers such as polylactic acid and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. [21][22][23][24][25] However, these polymers are not always considered biocompatible and the long-term effects of contact with patient tissues are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%