2021
DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-3-253-270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autochthonous synergy of Russian literary discourse

Abstract: The paper is aimed at describing the convergent effect of the interaction of several linguistic consciousness sense-forming channels, when their joint nonlinear impact significantly exceeds the total potential of individual elements of discursive activity. The texts of Russian Chernozem region writers are studied. The novelty of the research is that the role of the conjugate work of creative and receptive minds forming the two levels of autochthonous text-generating discourse (immanent and representative) is r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers such as Alefirenko (2010), Anikin (1961), Dobrovolsky (1997), Permyakov (1988), Savenkova (2002), Seliverstova (1990), Zhukov (1978), Whiting (1968), Arewa (1964), Dundes (1980), Mieder (1993), Taylor (1931), Paczolay (1997) became interested in the study of phraseology. Russian phraseology studies such issues as the regularity of the occurrence of phraseological units (PU), their objective signs and properties, syntactic structure, functional characteristics, as well as the possibility of use in language and speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers such as Alefirenko (2010), Anikin (1961), Dobrovolsky (1997), Permyakov (1988), Savenkova (2002), Seliverstova (1990), Zhukov (1978), Whiting (1968), Arewa (1964), Dundes (1980), Mieder (1993), Taylor (1931), Paczolay (1997) became interested in the study of phraseology. Russian phraseology studies such issues as the regularity of the occurrence of phraseological units (PU), their objective signs and properties, syntactic structure, functional characteristics, as well as the possibility of use in language and speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%