2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoantibodies to dense-fine-speckled 70 (DFS70) do not necessarily rule out connective tissue diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While comparing the association between anti-DFS70 antibodies and clinical indicators in SLE patients, there were some differences between our research and published studies (Table 4; Supplementary Table S5). We found significant associations of anti-DFS70-positive SLE patients with a higher frequency of anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q, more rapid ESR, and lower concentrations of C3, which are related to active SLE; however, our findings were distinct from the listed three studies (8,11,14) in Table 4. Choi et al and Aragoń et al reported negative associations between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA, and Mahler et al did not find any association between these two parameters.…”
Section: B C Acontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While comparing the association between anti-DFS70 antibodies and clinical indicators in SLE patients, there were some differences between our research and published studies (Table 4; Supplementary Table S5). We found significant associations of anti-DFS70-positive SLE patients with a higher frequency of anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q, more rapid ESR, and lower concentrations of C3, which are related to active SLE; however, our findings were distinct from the listed three studies (8,11,14) in Table 4. Choi et al and Aragoń et al reported negative associations between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA, and Mahler et al did not find any association between these two parameters.…”
Section: B C Acontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…In the past few years, increasing concerns have already been raised regarding the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in SARD cohorts. A recent study suggested anti-DFS70 antibodies were prevalent in connective tissue disease (CTD) patients, while the monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies were rare (8). In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, the positive rates of anti-DFS70 ranged from 0% to 22.1% by different methodologies among several studies (9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This only applies in cases of isolated occurrence; if other specific antibodies are found, they take precedence in the interpretation of the results. 19 The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in the general population is approximately 1%. 15,20 In rare cases it can be detected in patients with CTD, though here the antibody is usually accompanied by other CTD-associated antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dies trifft jedoch nur bei isoliertem Auftreten des Antikörpers zu. Bei Nachweis anderer spezifischer Antikörper spielen diese eine übergeordnete Rolle in der Interpretation der Ergebnisse 19 . Die Prävalenz von Anti‐DFS70‐Antikörpern in der Allgemeinbevölkerung liegt bei etwa 1% 15,20 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bei Nachweis anderer spezifischer Antikörper spielen diese eine übergeordnete Rolle in der Interpretation der Ergebnisse. 19 Die Prävalenz von Anti-DFS70-Antikörpern in der Allgemeinbevölkerung liegt bei etwa 1%. 15,20 In seltenen Fällen können sie bei Patienten mit Kollagenose nachgewiesen werden, wobei in diesen Fällen zumeist auch Kollagenose-assoziierte Antikörper nachweisbar sind.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified