Auto-évaluation de la douleur aiguë chez l’enfant. Utilisation de l’« échelle des visages » en version électronique sur micro-ordinateur de poche (PDA) palmOne™

Falinower, Sylvain; Martret, P.; Lombart, Bénédicte; Réti, Etienne; Krause, Dirk; Annequin, D.

doi:10.1016/s1624-5687(04)94524-6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The e-Ouch, or iDiary electronic diary, was developed for home use by children with arthritis (34), with good evidence of construct validity and feasibility (35). Groups in France and elsewhere are adapting the FPS-R and VAS for personal digital assistants (36). Computer-animated faces scales have been created independently by two groups (10,37); their primary advantages may be momentary (real-time) electronic data collection, analysis and display; they have not yet been proven to have any psychometric advantage over simpler paper and pencil scales.…”

Section: Electronic Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Children’s Self‐Report of Pain Intensity: What We Know, Where We Are Headed

Baeyer

2009

Pain Research and Management

154

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper provides a short, practical introduction to children’s self-report measures of pain intensity, followed by an overview of principles and issues. Details on individual self-report scales were previously reported in a landmark systematic review in 2006 and will not be repeated here. Broader measurement issues discussed here include interpretation of pain scores over time, across individuals and in relation to contextual factors; special considerations affecting children younger than six years of age; social communicative functions of pain reports; cognitive developmental factors in understanding pain scales and their anchors; screening for the ability to use self-report scales and training for children who do not have this skill; level of measurement (interval versus ordinal); estimating clinically significant change for groups and individuals; and measurement of aspects of pain other than intensity. Also highlighted are areas in which there has been progress and a lack of progress since the last time this topic was featured at the International Forum on Pediatric Pain in 1996. The present article closes with an outline of key areas for further research on children’s self-report of pain and a brief summary of recommendations for clinicians.

show abstract

Section: Electronic Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Children’s Self‐Report of Pain Intensity: What We Know, Where We Are Headed

Baeyer

2009

Pain Research and Management

154

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An alternative is to show one face at a time, giving the user the option to scroll across faces and select one. A group working in France has implemented such a PDA-based version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised for use in clinical trials [9]. They showed that a majority of children preferred the PDA over the paper version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised.…”

Section: Fanciullo Et Al Thus Gloss Over Important Differences Betwementioning

confidence: 99%

Computer-Animated Faces Pain Scale: Commentary on Fanciullo et al. (2007)

Baeyer¹,

Jaaniste²

2009

Pain Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Auto-évaluation de la douleur aiguë chez l’enfant. Utilisation de l’« échelle des visages » en version électronique sur micro-ordinateur de poche (PDA) palmOne™

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Children’s Self‐Report of Pain Intensity: What We Know, Where We Are Headed

Children’s Self‐Report of Pain Intensity: What We Know, Where We Are Headed

Computer-Animated Faces Pain Scale: Commentary on Fanciullo et al. (2007)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About