2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qw5h2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autistic perspectives on the future of clinical autism research

Abstract: There have been widespread expressions of dissatisfaction among autistic people and communities regarding the recommendations of the Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism.1 The authors of this article discussed the Commission’s report and some wider issues related to autism research in general as a committee of autistic people, the Global Autistic Task Force on Autism Research, comprising autistic professionals and representatives of organisations run by and for autistic peopl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the majority of autism research has been informed by the medical and psychiatric field, where autism is often described as a collection of "deficits" needing to be "fixed" (Hogan, 2019, p. 9). During the last two decades, both researchers and the autistic community itself have raised concerns about this overly deficits-focused approach to understanding autism (Milton & Sims, 2016;Pukki et al, 2022;Robertson, 2010). There is now a gradual shift from seeking to understand autism by observable signs and "symptoms" alone to first-person, subjective experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the majority of autism research has been informed by the medical and psychiatric field, where autism is often described as a collection of "deficits" needing to be "fixed" (Hogan, 2019, p. 9). During the last two decades, both researchers and the autistic community itself have raised concerns about this overly deficits-focused approach to understanding autism (Milton & Sims, 2016;Pukki et al, 2022;Robertson, 2010). There is now a gradual shift from seeking to understand autism by observable signs and "symptoms" alone to first-person, subjective experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have documented the harm experienced by members of the autistic community at the hands of autism research (Rosenblatt, 2018;McGill and Robinson, 2020;Pukki et al, 2022). Autistic 1 individuals have reported feeling tokenized or undervalued (Pellicano et al, 2014), being surrounded by dehumanizing, deficit, and stigmatizing language (Botha, 2021;Botha et al, 2021), feeling pathologized or "normalized" (Ashworth et al, 2020), and receiving lower ethical standards producing experiences of coercion, discomfort, and disempowerment (Cascio et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%