1991
DOI: 10.1080/0144341910110202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authority Structure, Classroom Openness and Student Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peer referents were measured by three items adapted from Eckles et al (2005) . For perceived control, an extended form of the Student Decision-Making Scale ( Eshel, 1991 ) was employed. This scale presented a student perspective on shared control in class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer referents were measured by three items adapted from Eckles et al (2005) . For perceived control, an extended form of the Student Decision-Making Scale ( Eshel, 1991 ) was employed. This scale presented a student perspective on shared control in class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer referents were measured by three items adapted from Eckles et al (2005). For perceived control, an extended form of the Student Decision-Making Scale (Eshel, 1991) was employed. This scale presented a student perspective on shared control in class.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inaccuracy in the outcomes may result from some exceptional cases, the data analysis to come in accordance with Hair et al (2019). The questionnaire used in this research was adopted from the previous research facilitating condition that adapted three items from Habibi et al (2020), perceived control adapted three items from Eshel (1991), self-efficacy adapted four items from Abdullah et al (2016), perceived ease of use adapted four items from Davis (1989), perceived usefulness adapted four items from Davis (1989), students' attitude towards use adapted four items from Ratna and Mehra, (2015), and actual use of e-learning system during COVID-19 pandemic adapted three items from Peral et al (2014); Ratna and Mehra, (2015).…”
Section: Instrument Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%