1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf01419681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authority, influence and control in consultation

Abstract: It has long been held in the literature that in the process of consultation the recipient of consultation, or consultee, is a free agent in relation to the consultant. Yet, the concept of "pure consultation" as that relationship where the consultee is free to accept or reject the consultant's advice and knowledge appears to be a myth. This paper discusses authority, influence, and control as intervening factors in the consultation relationship.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consultees found the first year of consultation to be useful and requested its return for the following year. The reasons enumerated in a global questionnaire included many of the same found in the literature: provision of expertise (Gaupp, 1966); objectivity (Altrocchi, 1972); sharing and support (Altrocchi et al, 1965); and insight (Caplan, 1970). Individual and group consultation were equally regarded and none of the Ts viewed consultation as "client-centered."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consultees found the first year of consultation to be useful and requested its return for the following year. The reasons enumerated in a global questionnaire included many of the same found in the literature: provision of expertise (Gaupp, 1966); objectivity (Altrocchi, 1972); sharing and support (Altrocchi et al, 1965); and insight (Caplan, 1970). Individual and group consultation were equally regarded and none of the Ts viewed consultation as "client-centered."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%