1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1975.tb02318.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authority as a key factor in adolescent disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before we can begin the negotiation, we sometimes have to resolve complex statutory and relational problems (Bruggen & Pitt-Aitkin, 1975) to distinguish authority from interest or influence. We may, for example, have to resolve differences between the father and the mother, between the social worker and her manager, or between the social worker and the foster parent/hostel manager.…”
Section: What We Do (When Applying the Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before we can begin the negotiation, we sometimes have to resolve complex statutory and relational problems (Bruggen & Pitt-Aitkin, 1975) to distinguish authority from interest or influence. We may, for example, have to resolve differences between the father and the mother, between the social worker and her manager, or between the social worker and the foster parent/hostel manager.…”
Section: What We Do (When Applying the Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, adolescents often respond well to the imposition of authority if they understand that it may be in their longer term best interest (Bruggen & Pitt-Aikens, 1973). The request for a court report invests the professional with (albeit temporary) authority, to engage otherwise reluctant clients and their families.…”
Section: Therapeutic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Structural family therapy provides a useful framework as it fits the court process, particularly the commissioning of the report questions, clarification of the roles of the professionals concerned and in the construction of the closing written statement (Dare, Goldberg, & Walinets, 1990;Jenkins, 1989;Minuchin, Montalvo, Guerney, Rosman, & Schumer, 1967;Reder, 1983). Surprisingly, adolescents often respond well to the imposition of authority if they understand that it may be in their longer term best interest (Bruggen & Pitt-Aikens, 1973). The request for a court report invests the professional with (albeit temporary) authority, to engage otherwise reluctant clients and their families.…”
Section: Therapeutic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easier for adolescents to develop healthily when there is a safe structure around which they can experiment, play, comply or rebel against: ‘the structure of standards of behaviour, of ideas, of times, of places and of limit’ , (Bruggen and Pitt-Aikens, 1975: 154). In attachment terms, they need a secure-enough base without which the task of growing is harder.…”
Section: The Authority Of the Adolescent Peer Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%