2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07379-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authoritative subspecies diagnosis tool for European honey bees based on ancestry informative SNPs

Abstract: Background With numerous endemic subspecies representing four of its five evolutionary lineages, Europe holds a large fraction of Apis mellifera genetic diversity. This diversity and the natural distribution range have been altered by anthropogenic factors. The conservation of this natural heritage relies on the availability of accurate tools for subspecies diagnosis. Based on pool-sequence data from 2145 worker bees representing 22 populations sampled across Europe, we employed two highly disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(108 reference statements)
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used only two colonies of A. m. macedonica; therefore, the results related to this subject should be considered preliminary. The distinctness of A. m. carpatica when compared with A. m. carnica and A. m. macedonica was also confirmed by a recent study based on single-nucleotide polymorphism ( [45], Figure S1). However, in another study based on microsatellites, bees from Romania were similar to those from Slovenia ([44], Figure S3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we used only two colonies of A. m. macedonica; therefore, the results related to this subject should be considered preliminary. The distinctness of A. m. carpatica when compared with A. m. carnica and A. m. macedonica was also confirmed by a recent study based on single-nucleotide polymorphism ( [45], Figure S1). However, in another study based on microsatellites, bees from Romania were similar to those from Slovenia ([44], Figure S3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Earlier studies of A. m. carpatica were based on wing size and the cubital index (which is a ratio of two wing vein lengths of the cubital cell) [39,40]. Later, it was investigated on the basis of mitochondrial DNA [41][42][43], microsatelites [44] and single-nucleotide polymorphism [45]. A. m. carpatica belongs to Lineage C [2,42,46], and it can be identified using molecular methods [45,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works screened narrower discovery panels, suited to the goals being addressed by the constructed assays. While Momeni, et al 58 screened 14 subspecies to construct a ~ 4 K SNP assay for diagnosing European subspecies, others used discovery panels with less than four subspecies to construct high- to medium-density SNP assays tailored for addressing multiple objectives, including analysis of variation linked to defensive behaviour against V. destructor 59 , 60 genomic selection and breeding 60 , identification of Africanised honey bees 61 , 62 , and inference of C-lineage introgression into M-lineage subspecies 42 , 52 , 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By sampling such an important fraction of the A. mellifera diversity, this discovery panel enabled detection of SNPs with low frequency of the minor allele (average MAF = 0.19), therefore minimizing ascertainment bias 57 . With the exception of the recently published study of Momeni, et al 58 , this is the largest and broadest panel used for SNP discovery in the honey bee. Previous works screened narrower discovery panels, suited to the goals being addressed by the constructed assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%