2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2999-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Author Correction: Combinatorial expression of GPCR isoforms affects signalling and drug responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to select interactors to include in model training, we mined the list of pruned BioGRID interactions and selected proteins interacting with at least one of the 78 TF characterized by CRISPRburst, and at least one TF absent from the CRISPRburst dataset. Out of this set, we only included proteins expressed in HeLa cells, defined based on their RNA expression levels above a log(pTPM+1) threshold of 0.1 in a public RNA-seq dataset (Human Protein Atlas cell line data) 65 . Self-interactions were assigned to each TF equal to the maximum number of evidence that TF has for any factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to select interactors to include in model training, we mined the list of pruned BioGRID interactions and selected proteins interacting with at least one of the 78 TF characterized by CRISPRburst, and at least one TF absent from the CRISPRburst dataset. Out of this set, we only included proteins expressed in HeLa cells, defined based on their RNA expression levels above a log(pTPM+1) threshold of 0.1 in a public RNA-seq dataset (Human Protein Atlas cell line data) 65 . Self-interactions were assigned to each TF equal to the maximum number of evidence that TF has for any factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aggregated DINO features to build cell-line profiles (Methods) and reveal their similarities (Figure 4A). For comparison, we created the cell-line similarity matrix according to transcriptional (RNAseq) profiles available through HPA 61 and used the Mantel similarity 62 to estimate their correlation (Methods). The RNAseq matrix has a Mantel statistic of 0.47 with the DINO matrix; higher than the statistic with the matrix of supervised CNN features (0.31) and the matrix of ImageNet DINO features (0.40).…”
Section: Dino Enables Unbiased Profiling Of Cellular Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%