Author

Schönert, Jörg

doi:10.1515/9783110316469.1

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Чак, споне које повезују референтни и фикционални свет у аутофикцији стварају неку врсту хибридног простора, који се увек може двојако тумачити. Смит и Вотсон тврде да аутобиографија "као пракса и чин [...] поништава идеју да постоји нека поларизујућа линија између фикције и документарне прозе" (Smith & Watson 2005: 368) 19 . С друге стране, Шефер види другачији квалитет овог хибридног простора и, потенцијално, његову проблематичну природу.…”

Section: аутор и аутофикција у роману карта и територија мишела уелбекаunclassified

“…Тако Мишел Уелбек у роману Покоравање (2016) конструише савремену Европу, односно Француску, и смешта своје ликове -фикционалне, али и ликове базиране на стварним личностима -у фикционални сценарио 18 Counterfactual fictions give rise to an analogous problem: it seems counterintuitive to say that in an autofiction, for example, proper names lose their referential power, since the point of autofiction is precisely the idea that fictional assertions apply to an existing person (the author himself ) (Schaeffer 16). 19 Thinking about the autobiographical as a practice and act, rather than one genre, undermines the notion that there is a polarizing boundary between fiction and nonfiction (Smith & Watson 2005: 368).…”

Section: аутор и аутофикција у роману карта и територија мишела уелбекаmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Author and Autofiction in Michel Houellebecqʼs Novel The Map and the Territory

Ignjatović¹,

Petkovic²

2019

fil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: аутор и аутофикција у роману карта и територија мишела уелбекаunclassified

Section: аутор и аутофикција у роману карта и територија мишела уелбекаmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Author and Autofiction in Michel Houellebecqʼs Novel The Map and the Territory

Ignjatović¹,

Petkovic²

2019

fil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The question of who or what constitutes an ‘author’ has been extensively discussed. Schonert (2014) notes that the significance of a single named author as a legal entity with material entitlements and personal responsibilities gained traction with the advent of the printing press and particularly from the 18th century onwards. However, the single named author has since been subject to critique.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking the contributions of young people with learning disabilities to iPad storymaking: a new model of distributed authorship

Doak

2023

Literacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital technologies such as iPads are now ubiquitous in classrooms and family homes, enabling new possibilities for all learners but particularly for those with disabilities. Existing literature explores how children with learning disabilities create and benefit from personalised digital stories but does not unpack theoretical understandings of their ‘authorship’. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an original model of ‘distributed authorship’ with three axes of distribution—interpersonal, technological and temporal—to account for the authorial contributions of young people with learning disabilities. Five families were given an iPad with Pictello storymaking app and instructed to use it with their young person in any way which was engaging for them. Data generation over 12 weeks included weekly diaries, home videos, semi‐structured interviews and story collection. Findings indicated that whilst ability to directly engage with the app varied, all the young people could be said to exert authorial influence on the stories distributed across three axes: support from others, support from the technology itself and incorporation of prior embodied agency. The study has theoretical implications for our understanding of ‘authorship’ as well as implications for pedagogy and practice by reconceptualising severely disabled children as literate learners and co‐authors.

show abstract

“…Authorization as a degree of manifestation of authorship of magazine text was formed as a result of transformation of the category of author under the influence of genre specificity of texts. In this research paper the author is distinguished as a creator of texts (Barthes, 1993) and the authorship as the addressee status in relation to the work (Schönert, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Modern understanding of individual authorization is most closely connected with the concepts of the performer, the creator, the author's image, narrator with his own worldview, principles, judgments, biography and creativity (Bohnenkamp, 2002;Scholz, 1999;Schönert, 2009). Author's anonymity and pseudo-authorship are early manifestations of institutional authorization.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Linguistic Means of Authorization in Modern English Magazine Discourse: Constructionist Rhetorical Approach

2020

Cognition, Communication, Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the linguistic means of authorization in English magazine discourse. It proposes a definition of authorization and its discursive realization with the implementation of rhetorical canons and ways of persuasion. The linguistic means of authorization is represented by constructions which due to the fusion of form and meaning or form and function reflect the authorship – individual, institutional or collective. The paper distinguishes two types of constructions: deictic indicating individual authorization and impersonal pointing to the institutional authorship. With respect to the referential meaning of its constituents, deictic constructions fall into orientational fixing the author’s place in the environment: somatic relating to the author’s body; perceptual rendering visual, auditory or tactile modalities; locational referring to the author’s whereabouts. Constructions denoting an author’s activity refer to different spheres: cognitive; communicative; professional. Constructions referring to social relations reveal the addressor’s roles in two domains: immediate surroundings, covering family, friends, household as well as the wide public life encompassing politics and economics. Constructions appealing to pathos evoke evaluation, emotions or human needs uniting the author and readers. Constructions rendering institutional authorization represent the authors’ distance from the contents by four subtypes of subjective constructions: nominal, pronominal, predicative referring to event participants as well as discursive. Moreover, the functioning of deictic and impersonal constructions as authorization devices is subordinated to disposition with differing frequency. The collective authorship, which can be bi- and multiple, results from the interaction of constructions rendering individual and institutional authorization.

show abstract

Author

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

The Author and Autofiction in Michel Houellebecqʼs Novel The Map and the Territory

The Author and Autofiction in Michel Houellebecqʼs Novel The Map and the Territory

Rethinking the contributions of young people with learning disabilities to iPad storymaking: a new model of distributed authorship

Linguistic Means of Authorization in Modern English Magazine Discourse: Constructionist Rhetorical Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About