2017
DOI: 10.1080/08905436.2017.1369886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authentication technologies using DNA-based approaches for meats and halal meats determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding substitutions of meat ingredients by other animal species, such as tissues, fat or proteins, some authors have reported recent studies in pork (Al-Kahtani, Ismail, & Asif Ahmed, 2017;Yacoub & Sadek, 2017). In this context, a recent review explaining all DNA-based techniques used for the study of meat authenticity has been recently published (El Sheikha, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding substitutions of meat ingredients by other animal species, such as tissues, fat or proteins, some authors have reported recent studies in pork (Al-Kahtani, Ismail, & Asif Ahmed, 2017;Yacoub & Sadek, 2017). In this context, a recent review explaining all DNA-based techniques used for the study of meat authenticity has been recently published (El Sheikha, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halal products attract non‐Muslim consumers that focus on the origin of goods. Hence, the authenticity and integrity of the products are part and parcel of a product being labeled halal …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The food labels of meat and meat products are required to mark the meat source specifically to prevent adulteration in many countries, but the mixture of lower-price meat into high-price meat is still common, for example, adulterating pork or duck meat into beef or mutton or donkey meat, therefore, a reliable identification method of meat species is critical for surveillance of the commercial adulteration (Hong et al, 2017). The existing identification methods are mainly classified into protein-based approaches, for example, radioimmunoassay (Lowenstein et al, 2006), chromatography (Lozano et al, 2017;Pebriana et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2018) and Chemometrics-Assisted Shotgun Proteomics (Yuswan et al, 2018), and DNA-based approaches (Sheikha et al, 2017), for example, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Karabasanavar et al, 2017;Man et al, 2012;Mane et al, 2012), multi-PCR (Abuzinadah et al, 2015;Jia et al, 2016), realtime PCR (ÅAkalar & Kaynak, 2016;Herrero et al, 2013;Pegels et al, 2015;Sudjadi et al, 2016), PCR-RFLP (Bielikova et al, 2010), Biochip technology (Iwobi et al, 2011), forensically informative nucleotide sequencing (Rajpoot et al, 2017), and real-time PCR coupled melting curve analysis (Yuru et al, 2016). The structure of meat protein are usually destroyed by the processes such as shredding, cooking and roasting, therefore, the reliability of protein-based approaches is compromised, by comparison, the DNA-based approaches are more reliable, among which PCR is the most commonest assay, PCR, forensically informative nucleotide sequencing and melting curve for analyzing the adulterated meat product is very effective, but limited by the presence of PCR inhibitors in real biological samples and food samples, and meat products are the very complex matrix, mainly composed of proteins, lipids, pigments, enzymes, and other substances, which may interfere with PCR reactions (Wilson, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%