Authentic leadership in healthcare: a scoping review

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review peer-reviewed original research articles on authentic leadership (AL) in health care to identify potential research gaps and present recommendations for future research. The objectives are to examine and map evidence of the main characteristics, research themes and methodologies in the studies. AL is a leader's non-authoritarian, ethical and transparent behaviour pattern. Design/methodology/approach A scoping review with thematic analysis was conducted. A three-step search strategy was used with database and manual searches. The included studies were composed of English language peer-reviewed original research articles referring to both AL and health care. Findings In total, 29 studies were included. The studies favoured Canadian nurses in acute care hospitals. AL was understood as its original definition. The review identified four research themes: well-being at work, patient care quality, work environment and AL promotion. Quantitative research methodology with the authentic leadership questionnaire and cross-sectional design were prevalent. Research limitations/implications Future research needs more variation in research themes, study populations, settings, organisations, work sectors, geographical origins and theory perspectives. Different research methodologies, such as qualitative and mixed methods research and longitudinal designs, should be used more. Originality/value This is presumably the first literature review to map the research on AL in health care.

The Relationship Between Authentic Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, Role Clarity, and Work Engagement: Evidence From South Africa

“…Authentic leadership places a focus on those positive aspects which should be augmented and that allow individuals to flourish ( Luthans et al, 2001 ; Avolio and Gardner, 2005 ; Malila et al, 2017 ). AL is a leader’s ability to (a) display awareness of themselves and the impact they have on others (i.e., self-awareness ), (b) act in line with their morals and values and to withstand pressure from others (i.e., internalized moral perspective ), (c) objectively analyze all available information and views, including those which may differ from their own, to make balanced decisions (i.e., balanced processing ), and (d) act with transparency in dealings with others (i.e., relational transparency ) ( Walumbwa et al, 2008 ; Gill et al, 2018 ).…”

“…The challenges faced by leaders (and their subordinates) in the mining industry (i.e., more physical) is vastly different from those experienced in the healthcare industry (i.e., more emotional). Haddon et al (2015); Malila et al (2017) advocate for research on the effectiveness of different leadership styles across varying contexts. Third, studies mostly focus on either mediation or moderation.…”

Leadership Styles and Nurses’ Job Satisfaction. Results of a Systematic Review

“…This model is a leader's non-authoritarian, ethical, and transparent behaviour pattern. It strives for trusting, symmetrical, and close leader-follower relationships and promotes the open sharing of information and consideration of employees' viewpoints [17].…”

Pathway to professionalizing health leadership in Canada: The two faces of Janus

“…[8][9][10] Better leadership leads to a healthier workforce, and a healthy workforce leads to healthier citizens. 11,12 Effective leadership leads to higher levels of optimism and trust in the organization 13,14 and can contribute to healthy and productive workplaces through positive role modeling and manipulating working conditions. [15][16][17] There is a strong relationship between psychologically healthy workplaces and employee turnover.…”