Authentic Connections Groups: A Pilot Test of an Intervention Aimed at Enhancing Resilience Among Nurse Leader Mothers

Abstract

Background Nurse leaders who are mothers are at significant risk for experiencing stress, burnout, and occupational fatigue. Authentic Connections (AC) Groups is an intervention shown to be effective for fostering resilience among at‐risk moms, including physicians; however, it has not previously been tested with nurse leaders. Aims Our aims were to test the feasibility and acceptability of the AC Groups intervention with nurse leader mothers and examine its effects on participant resilience, as measured by increased self‐compassion and decreased distress, depression, perceived stress, and burnout. Methods A randomized controlled trial design was employed for this pilot study, with 36 nurse leaders at Mayo Clinic. AC participants attended group sessions for an hour per week for 12 weeks. Control group members were provided 1 hr per week of free time over 12 weeks. Multiple self‐report psychological measures were completed at baseline, post‐intervention, and 3‐month follow‐up. Results The AC Groups intervention was feasible and well‐received by nurse leaders. Session attendance rates averaged 92%. Despite the small n’s, repeated measures of Analysis of Variance showed significantly greater improvements (p < .05) for participants in the AC Groups than control condition for depression, self‐compassion, and perceived stress, with large effect sizes (ηp2 0.18–0.22). In addition, effect sizes for anxiety and feeling loved approximated the moderate range (ηp2 0.05 and .07). Linking Evidence to Action The AC intervention shows promise as a feasible intervention for mitigating nurse leader mothers’ stress by positively impacting indices of well‐being, including depression, self‐compassion, and perceived stress. Given, the prevalence of stress and burnout among nurse leaders, the effectiveness of the AC intervention in fostering resilience in this population has significant implications for research and practice. Further research is warranted with larger numbers from multiple sites, longer follow‐up periods, and biomarker measures of stress.

The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership Practices of First‐Line Nurse Managers and Nurses’ Organizational Resilience and Job Involvement: A Structural Equation Model

“…Various researchers have signified certain fundamental factors that foster resilience among nurses. Chesak et al (2020) and Ramalisa et al (2018) concluded that resilience can be attributed to a caring workplace and collegial support networks for nurses which are crucial in building employees' morale, fostering cohesion, and sharing accountabilities amongst them. A resilience training program can increase the capacity to mitigate workplace adversity, increase personal resilience, and influence their decision to remain in the workforce.…”

“…This finding means as FLMNs' supportive and empowering leadership practices increase, so do nurses' resilience and job involvement. Nurse leaders play a pivotal role in building and sustaining a safe and healthy work environment (Chesak et al, 2020). Nurses who have a caring nurse manager have more opportunities to engage in decision-making, improve communication, and develop resilient behaviors, thus resulting in a higher level of job involvement.…”

“…Tau et al (2018) concluded that higher leadership skills are related to higher levels of resilience. Corresponding to this perspective, Chesak et al (2020) stated that nurse leaders who authentically present with themselves and nurses have the potential to increase connectedness, enhance personal and professional satisfaction, and promote resilience. Our findings expand the literature on the practice of leadership by specifying the role of resilience as a mediator in this relationship.…”

Risk and resilience during COVID-19: A new study in the Zigler paradigm of developmental science

“…Two randomized trials were conducted, with providers at the Mayo Clinics in Arizona and Minnesota respectively. Findings showed improvements compared to controls on multiple indicators of well-being (including cortisol levels) with moderate effect sizes, and gains sustained well after the program was completed (for summaries, see Chesak et al, 2020; Luthar et al, 2019a).…”

Strategies for Resiliency of Medical Staff During COVID-19

“…To support resilience, institutions must provide multiple avenues for workers to exchange feelings safely and manage stress and negative emotions effectively. Many existing peer-support programs (from before the pandemic) and structured stress management interventions have been shown to be beneficial to decrease stress, promote resilience, 9 and support an organizational culture of shared responsibility for well-being. At the outbreak of the pandemic, it quickly became apparent at Mayo Clinic that there was a need to support employee well-being and a broad desire by staff to provide support to fellow employees.…”