Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets 2013
DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aut Dedere Aut Judicare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Niblock, 2016) In fact, every interpretive activity should meet its intrinsic boundaries as was the case for instance of state's competence in the repression of crimes. In this case, the repressive system was inspired by the principle of international universality imposed and expressed by the principle of aut dedere aut judicare (International Law Commission, 2014;Van Steenberghe, 2013;Newton, 2014) that imposes on States that want or not want to judge the alleged perpetrators of the crime of extradition. (Hayes, 2012, pg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Niblock, 2016) In fact, every interpretive activity should meet its intrinsic boundaries as was the case for instance of state's competence in the repression of crimes. In this case, the repressive system was inspired by the principle of international universality imposed and expressed by the principle of aut dedere aut judicare (International Law Commission, 2014;Van Steenberghe, 2013;Newton, 2014) that imposes on States that want or not want to judge the alleged perpetrators of the crime of extradition. (Hayes, 2012, pg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%