Fokusgruppen in Der Empirischen Sozialwissenschaft 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mittels Zusammenfassung zentraler Diskussionsaspekte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The experts represented the entire valley, from lower to upper Ötztal. The record of the focus group served to extract relevant passages of discussion [59] to underpin our quantitative results as well as our heuristic concept. To get a greater insight in our study site and research interest as well as to answer our research questions, we ran an SPSS-supported descriptive analysis based on univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experts represented the entire valley, from lower to upper Ötztal. The record of the focus group served to extract relevant passages of discussion [59] to underpin our quantitative results as well as our heuristic concept. To get a greater insight in our study site and research interest as well as to answer our research questions, we ran an SPSS-supported descriptive analysis based on univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complement the statistical analyses, we examined the data from four focus groups (audio files and corresponding transcriptions, notes on flipcharts, short questionnaires and memos) comprised of the recipients of subsidies following a thematic analysis [48,49]. The focus group data was analysed with a special concentration on identifying the drivers and barriers concerning the utilization of energy advice services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, ex-post evaluations can-strictly speaking-only examine coincidences, for example, the use of advice services and the decision to increase the energy efficiency level of the renovation, without knowing the temporal sequencing of the factors. Secondly, we acknowledge that self-reported measures for effectiveness tend to be "vulnerable to various cognitive biases (e.g., impression management and social desirability effects)" ( [48], p. 149). The survey respondents were contacted based on the fact that they were in the database of the cantonal energy office, and were informed that the research was conducted by an independent institute, but in collaboration with the cantonal energy offices.…”
Section: Limitations and Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das Material wurde in Anlehnung an die Methode der zentralen Aussagen [27] Dieses Dokument wurde zum persönlichen Gebrauch heruntergeladen. Vervielfältigung nur mit Zustimmung des Verlages.…”
Section: Fokusgruppeunclassified