Australians are not equally protected from industrial air pollution

Abstract

Australian air pollution standards are set at national and state levels for a number of chemicals harmful to human health. However, these standards do not need to be met when ad hoc pollution licences are issued by state environment agencies. This situation results in a highly unequal distribution of air pollution between towns and cities, and across the country. This paper examines these pollution regulations through two case studies, specifically considering the ability of the regulatory regime to protect human health from lead and sulphur dioxide pollution in the communities located around smelters. It also considers how the proposed National Clean Air Agreement, once enacted, might serve to reduce this pollution equity problem. Through the case studies we show that there are at least three discrete concerns relating to the current licencing system. They are: non-onerous emission thresholds for polluting industry; temporal averaging thresholds masking emission spikes; and ineffective penalties for breaching licence agreements. In conclusion, we propose a set of new, legally-binding national minimum standards for industrial air pollutants must be developed and enforced, which can only be modified by more (not less) stringent state licence arrangements.

Inequalities in exposure to the air pollutants PM2.5 and NO2 in Australia

“…Anthropogenic sources, such as traffic and industry which are primarily concentrated in urban areas, can be regulated directly through environmental and planning policy. Examples of relevant policy measures include setting limits on acceptable levels of emissions in the licensing agreements of industrial sources (Dobbie and Green 2015) and legislating fuel efficiency standards (Smit 2019). In contrast, emissions from natural sources of PM 2.5 , such as bush fires and dust storms in rural areas, cannot be regulated directly via policy due to the large number of environmental and meteorological factors that affect their occurrence, location and intensity.…”

Focus on environmental justice: new directions in international research

“…While EJ research has traditionally focused on issues of distributive justice, several letters in this focus issue extend EJ scholarship through a critical assessment of environmental policies, procedural issues, and regulatory frameworks. Dobbie and Green's (2015) research considers the effectiveness of Australia's national policy in protecting the public from air pollution. Their two case studies indicate that much remains to be done since existing regulation provides loopholes that enable industries to escape pollution norms.…”

Cruising for better air quality: Australian clean air submissions, issues, and recommendations

“…Regulation relies on ambient air sampled over time for selected pollutants. Measures often fail to sufficiently detect risks for those nearest pollution sources [11]. Ship exhaust specifically contributed 1.9% PM2.5 in greater Sydney and 9.4% in port communities, rates that demonstrably affect human health and are responsible for ~220 years of life lost when local respiratory-related deaths attributed to ship exhaust exposure are considered [12].…”