Australian doctors’ involvement in medicolegal matters: a cross‐sectional self‐report study

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the frequency of, and factors associated with, Australian doctors’ involvement in medicolegal matters. Design, setting and participants: Cross‐sectional survey of Australian doctors (specialists, trainees and general practitioners) insured with the medical insurance company Avant. A self‐report questionnaire was mailed to Avant members in September 2007 to gather data on their involvement in medicolegal matters. Information on psychiatric morbidity and alcohol consumption was also collected using the General Health Questionnaire and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Main outcome measures: Occurrence and type of past and current medicolegal matters with which doctors have been involved. Results: Of 8500 doctors invited to participate, 2999 returned completed surveys (36% response rate). Sixty‐five per cent of respondents had been involved in a medicolegal matter at some time, and 14% were involved in a current matter. The two most common types of medicolegal matter were claims for compensation and complaints to a health care complaints body. Doctors were more likely to be involved in medicolegal matters if they were male, worked in high‐intervention areas of medicine (surgery and obstretics/gynaecology), and worked longer hours. Conclusion: Our study concurs with other studies in finding an association between medicolegal matters and being male, working long hours and working in high‐intervention areas of medicine. Unlike other studies, we found no association between age and involvement in a current medicolegal matter. Our findings also pose the question of whether psychiatric morbidity in doctors is a cause or effect of the medicolegal process.

Identification of poor performance in a national medical workforce over 11 years: an observational study

“…Some of our findings about differences between practitioner groups are consistent with previous studies 5 14 15. Men were 2.5 times more likely than women to be referred because of concerns about their practice or conduct.…”

The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review

“…20 Other surveys in the UK, Australia and the USA examining total career litigation reported rates of 12%, 21% and 38.9%, respectively. [21][22][23] With regard to paediatric malpractice claims against general practitioners (GPs), a French review which reviewed 228 paediatric claims reported an annual prevalence rate of 0.07%. 24 Malpractice claims for primary care compared with other specialties Several studies presented the proportion of primary care malpractice claims compared with that of other specialties on medical indemnity databases.…”

Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: a national study of healthcare complaints in Australia

“…At the population level, however, there are patterns. Previous studies have compared doctors who experienced multiple malpractice claims,1–5 complaints,6 7 and disciplinary actions8–10 with doctors who experienced few or none, and identified differences in the sex, age and specialty profile of the two groups. Such research helps to explain medico-legal risk retrospectively, but does not provide practical guidance for identifying risks prospectively.…”