The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Indigenous Australia and New Guinea 2022
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190095611.013.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australia’s First People

Abstract: Mainland Australia was connected to New Guinea and Tasmania at various times throughout the Pleistocene and formed the supercontinent of Sahul. Sahul contains some of the earliest known archaeological evidence for Homo sapiens outside of Africa, with a growing record of early complex social, technological, and artistic life. Here we present an overview of the oldest known sites in Australia along with key evidence pertaining to the dynamic cultures of early Aboriginal peoples. We review debates surrounding the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with the sampling strategy, the size of the sample was constrained, however it was sufficient (more than double the number of channel artefacts) for preliminary comparison. There is no hard and fast numerical or proportional test for the appropriateness of a sample beyond “more is better”, however it is generally accepted that a sample is more robust if you can draw random samples and not dramatically change the statistical result [ 7 ]. As noted above, additional artefacts have been added to this dataset (S4_Table in S1 File ) since publication of [ 1 ] and this increases the dataset by 7%.…”
Section: Additional Methodological Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the sampling strategy, the size of the sample was constrained, however it was sufficient (more than double the number of channel artefacts) for preliminary comparison. There is no hard and fast numerical or proportional test for the appropriateness of a sample beyond “more is better”, however it is generally accepted that a sample is more robust if you can draw random samples and not dramatically change the statistical result [ 7 ]. As noted above, additional artefacts have been added to this dataset (S4_Table in S1 File ) since publication of [ 1 ] and this increases the dataset by 7%.…”
Section: Additional Methodological Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%