Austerity and Its Antitheses: Practical Negations of Capitalist Legitimacy

Abstract

This article investigates the manner in which anti-austerity protests constitute practical negations of capitalist legitimacy. The analysis is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the key issues at stake in contemporary anti-austerity protests, from capitalist legitimacy to collective forms of autonomy. The second part examines central sociological dimensions permeating the reality of austerity, from the power of the state, via the pervasive processes of commodification, to the emergence of a “new spirit of capitalism.” The third part reflects on the emancipatory potential of anti-austerity movements, arguing that they contribute to personal and social empowerment, as well as to radical democratization. The article suggests that the recent protests against austerity indicate that there is room not only for despair but also for hope.

The 'Postmodern Turn' in the Social Sciences

“…163, 169, 197, 202, and 212. On this point, see also, for instance, ; Browne and Susen (2014); . 393. , p. 495.…”

Austerity Policies: A Way to Escape from the Crisis?

“…Böylesi bir durumda-özellikle de bir para birliğine üye olan ülkeler içinkemer sıkma politikalarının uygulanması yerine ödemeler bilançosu sorununu çözmeye yönelik politikalara öncelik verilmelidir (UNCTAD, 2011). (Browne & Susen, 2014).…”

“…Neo-liberal model bu amacını; özelleştirme, deregülasyon, bürokratikleşmenin azaltılması, ademi merkezileşmesi süreçleri ile işletmektedir. Bu nedenle 21. yüzyılda kemer sıkma politikaları bu neo-liberal politikanın ayrılmaz bir parçasıdır(Browne & Susen, 2014) Dünya ekonomisinde 1970'lere kadar bütçe açığının verilmesi, başarılı bir şekilde genişleyici maliye politikası uygulamanın doğal bir yolu olarak görülmüştür. Bu müdahaleci politikaların kamu kesiminin etkinsizliği, kaynak tahsisinde bozulmalara yol açtığı şeklindeki eleştiriler ve karşı çıkmalar sonucunda 1980'li yıllarda küresel sistemde neo-liberal politikaların hakimiyeti görülmeye başlamıştır.…”

Towards a Critical Sociology of Dominant Ideologies: An Unexpected Reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski

“…And yet, behind the euphemistic language of 'openness', 'change', and 'dynamism' lurk both competitiveness, as an ideal, and competition, as a reality. In the face of the increasing individualization of societies that are governed by neo-liberal regimes and, in many cases, hit by austerity programmes 271 , it has become a given to 'put everyone in competition with everyone else and, thereby, fragment realms whose only defensive resource would be union' 272 . The gradual 'withdrawal of the state' 273 from the economy -that is, the end of Keynesian state-interventionism -signals the emergence of a new type of domination: […] this new form of domination […], a reorientation of the state's modes of action, permitting it to serve the interests of a type of capitalism that has itself been profoundly modified.…”