2018
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Austerity and families with disabled children: a European survey

Abstract: A decline in quality of services for disabled children was reported by most family and many professional respondents across Europe, regardless of austerity. Where implemented, austerity measures were reported to have impacted significantly on families with disabled children. What this paper adds Stigma about disability remains a challenge in many countries across Europe. Most families and many health care professionals reported worsening quality of services than 3 years ago, regardless of austerity. Austerity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dimensions that comprised the tangible aspects, specifically CR and TFM, obtained the lowest scores, whereas the dimensions related to the intervention of professionals, such as QS, I and TSI, showed higher valuations. These results show similarities with those obtained by Horridge et al [46], where the valuations of the professionals were lower in aspects related to the facilities and treatment rooms. These results could be due to the cutbacks to early childhood intervention centres and treatment equipment [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The dimensions that comprised the tangible aspects, specifically CR and TFM, obtained the lowest scores, whereas the dimensions related to the intervention of professionals, such as QS, I and TSI, showed higher valuations. These results show similarities with those obtained by Horridge et al [46], where the valuations of the professionals were lower in aspects related to the facilities and treatment rooms. These results could be due to the cutbacks to early childhood intervention centres and treatment equipment [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Monetary Fund (IMF), 16 the European Union's Maastricht criteria, 17 or by analysing spending on families/children social protection in specific periods of time. 18,19 A before-after approach was used to compare Italy, Greece, France and the UK, 20 in terms of the ability of social benefits to reduce child poverty.…”
Section: Measures the Level Of Austerity Measures Was Assessed By Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 A before-after approach was used to compare Italy, Greece, France and the UK, 20 in terms of the ability of social benefits to reduce child poverty. One cross-sectional study collected information on a survey to families of disabled children and professionals from 32 European countries, 17 while a followup of a cohort of children from Ireland reported on the consequences of reported reductions on welfare benefits, 21 and a qualitative study from Scotland provided information on the impact of austerity measures on families with disabled children. 22…”
Section: Measures the Level Of Austerity Measures Was Assessed By Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austerity measures implemented by the most recent Brazilian governments has been threatening the hard‐earned achievements of the SUS in its pursuit to provide universal health care (Castro et al, ; Massuda et al, ; Souza et al, ). Similar detrimental effects of austerity measures in health care have been shown in other countries such as Cyprus (Petrou, ), Finland (Saltman & Teperi, ), Portugal (Morais Nunes, Cunha Ferreira, & Campos Fernandes, ), and in many other countries (Horridge et al, ; Ruckert & Labonté, ), even as evidence shows that local and national public health interventions are highly cost‐saving (Masters, Anwar, Collins, Cookson, & Capewell, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%