2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-3159-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Austempering in low-C steels: microstructure development and nanohardness characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, if the grain boundary length measured at 2 • corresponding to the DF population (see Figure 10) is compared to the evolution of the dislocation density plotted in Figure 11 in the same ferrite family, a similar progression in both parameters is then observed. On the other hand, the small differences in hardness observed in Figure 4c may be attributed to the formation of a substructure (high density of LAGB) within the deformed ferrite population, as hardness increases in the vicinities of the grain boundaries [12,13].…”
Section: Relation Between Dislocation Density Nanohardness and Strain...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, if the grain boundary length measured at 2 • corresponding to the DF population (see Figure 10) is compared to the evolution of the dislocation density plotted in Figure 11 in the same ferrite family, a similar progression in both parameters is then observed. On the other hand, the small differences in hardness observed in Figure 4c may be attributed to the formation of a substructure (high density of LAGB) within the deformed ferrite population, as hardness increases in the vicinities of the grain boundaries [12,13].…”
Section: Relation Between Dislocation Density Nanohardness and Strain...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this context, nanoindentation would seem to be a suitable technique to evaluate the mechanical properties of a mixed microstructure and, to this end, nanohardness measurements were calculated in order to estimate the hardness of the non-deformed ferrite (NDF) and deformed ferrite (DF) populations separately in the work presented here. Nanoindentation has been widely used in multiphase steels in order to differentiate between phases and characterize each constituent mechanically [9][10][11][12][13]. Rodriguez et al [10] measured the hardness of different phases and researched the influence of the indentation size effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tensile properties of steels are directly controlled by the strength of the matrix, which is (BF + FM) for TBF, (PM + BF + FM) for QP, and stability of RA. Nanoindentation measurements show that the hardness of BF, low-carbon martensite, high-carbon martensite and RA is 5-6, 7-11, 10-14 and 6-7.5 GPa, respectively [42]. The yield stress of the FM (i.e.…”
Section: Relationship Between Microstructure and Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a recent research interest to relate the micro-scale deformation behaviour of the individual phase constituents to the tensile properties of multiphase steels [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, none of those studies extended that approach to explaining the impact toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%