2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.142750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ausforming and tempering of a novel ultra-high strength steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the classic Williamson–Hall method was recently utilized in several studies which evaluated the dislocation density of the tempered microstructure of ultrahigh strength steels. [ 45–52 ] No martensitic microstructures with the high dislocation density exist in the present steels, and their microstructure is comparable with the tempered steel consisting of fully ferritic matrix‐containing precipitates; thus, this study calculated the dislocation densities using the classic Williamson–Hall method (Equation (3))ρ=ρsρp$$\left(^{\rho = \textrm{ } \sqrt{} \rho}\right)_{\text{s}} \left(^{\rho}\right)_{\text{p}}$$where ρ s is the dislocation density calculated from strain broadening and ρ p is the dislocation density calculated from crystallite size. The following Equation (4) and (5) were used to evaluate ρ s and ρ p of the body‐centered cubic metalρs= 14.4ε2false/Fb2$$\left(\rho\right)_{\text{s}} = \textrm{ } 14.4 \left(\epsilon\right)^{2} / F b^{2}$$ρp= 3nfalse/D2$$\left(\rho\right)_{\text{p}} = \textrm{ } 3 n / D^{2}$$where ε is microstrain, b is Burgers vector, F is an interaction factor assumed to be 1, and D is crystallite size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the classic Williamson–Hall method was recently utilized in several studies which evaluated the dislocation density of the tempered microstructure of ultrahigh strength steels. [ 45–52 ] No martensitic microstructures with the high dislocation density exist in the present steels, and their microstructure is comparable with the tempered steel consisting of fully ferritic matrix‐containing precipitates; thus, this study calculated the dislocation densities using the classic Williamson–Hall method (Equation (3))ρ=ρsρp$$\left(^{\rho = \textrm{ } \sqrt{} \rho}\right)_{\text{s}} \left(^{\rho}\right)_{\text{p}}$$where ρ s is the dislocation density calculated from strain broadening and ρ p is the dislocation density calculated from crystallite size. The following Equation (4) and (5) were used to evaluate ρ s and ρ p of the body‐centered cubic metalρs= 14.4ε2false/Fb2$$\left(\rho\right)_{\text{s}} = \textrm{ } 14.4 \left(\epsilon\right)^{2} / F b^{2}$$ρp= 3nfalse/D2$$\left(\rho\right)_{\text{p}} = \textrm{ } 3 n / D^{2}$$where ε is microstrain, b is Burgers vector, F is an interaction factor assumed to be 1, and D is crystallite size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the classic Williamson-Hall method was recently utilized in several studies which evaluated the dislocation density of the tempered microstructure of ultrahigh strength steels. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] No martensitic microstructures with the high dislocation density exist in the present steels, and their microstructure is comparable with the tempered steel consisting of fully ferritic matrix-containing precipitates; thus, this study calculated the dislocation densities using the classic Williamson-Hall method (Equation (3))…”
Section: Dislocation Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%