2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2010.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auscultation in Flight: Comparison of Conventional and Electronic Stethoscopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found in children with respiratory diseases (-0.08<kappa<0.86) [23][24][25]. Direct comparisons between conventional and digital stethoscopes showed that, although digital stethoscopes have a better sound quality [26], the performance of health professionals to detect respiratory sounds is not enhanced by its use [27].…”
Section: Respiratory Soundsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar results were found in children with respiratory diseases (-0.08<kappa<0.86) [23][24][25]. Direct comparisons between conventional and digital stethoscopes showed that, although digital stethoscopes have a better sound quality [26], the performance of health professionals to detect respiratory sounds is not enhanced by its use [27].…”
Section: Respiratory Soundsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It is likely, however, that electronic capture of carotid sounds is more reliable based on the greater prevalence of bruits in FDS2 versus FDS1 of 6.1% versus 4.5% 3 and in other studies directly comparing the two methods. 11,12 The present study suggests that electronic auscultation is more accurate than a conventional acoustic stethoscope for the detection of carotid bruits in patients with diabetes, while offering the convenience of later interpretation if a skilled operator is not available when the patient is assessed. The presence of a bruit identified in this way should prompt (1) intensified cardiovascular risk factor management and (2) consideration of ultrasonography and perhaps other imaging with a view to revascularization, depending on symptoms and factors such as age and comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…4 The higher sensitivity and lower specificity found in the present study could be due to several factors. First, the better acoustic quality obtained using the electronic stethoscope 11,12 may have meant that more bruits were detected. This includes softer bruits both associated with reduced flow in severely stenosed vessels, 24 thus increasing sensitivity, and as a manifestation of low-grade stenoses or vascular tortuosity, which would attenuate specificity and positive predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electronic stethoscope has been found to be useful in the noisy environment of military flight medicine, where physicians contend with jet engines to listen to lung sounds. When using an electronic stethoscope aboard a Boeing C135 military transport airplane, physicians rated it better for hearing heart and lung sounds 12. A study by the same group using a “Sim-Man” mannequin in an environment simulating that aboard a C135 demonstrated better performance on pulmonary auscultation by a sample of four intensivists and a nurse anaesthetist when using an electronic stethoscope 13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%